We real “truthers” have a hard time getting people to take us seriously when we have the “troofers” talking about no planes or reptile people or crap like that. I’m fairly convinced no-planers are planted disinformationists paid to do just exactly that too.

Planes were used, even at the pentagon and there is more evidence to support a plane then there is against it. You have to dismiss a lot of evidence to support the bogus ‘missile’ theory. Just because eyewitness testimonies don’t alway match up (they don’t match up when say a car crashed into your local farmers market either) or photos/video look fake (newsflash… the media alters and fakes videos and photos for everything they cover) or you read something with real pictures and misleading descriptions (the infamous ‘punch out’ hole which was created post-crash for access to the damaged areas and not by a missile, or the one photo of 15-foot high firetruck spray covering up the entry hole pre-collapse you see the most as opposed to others that do show plane-sized damage) does not mean it was a missile.

Watch for these idiots who say things like “This is CONCLUSIVE proof” or “As you just saw, BEYOND A DOUBT it wasn’t a plane” or other statements that are meant to play with your mind psychologically.

Planes were used. Were those planes hijacked? Who knows… I have my doubts. Check out Ryan Dawson’s “War by Deception”. And focus on FACTS about 9/11 that we know do not add up to the official story. Not no-plane nonsense.