<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is This The End Of The Line For The Impartial Documentary?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/is-this-the-end-of-the-line-for-the-impartial-documentary/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/is-this-the-end-of-the-line-for-the-impartial-documentary/</link>
	<description>alternative views, news &#38; information—online, video and print</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:34:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Manny Furious</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/is-this-the-end-of-the-line-for-the-impartial-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-1873</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny Furious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 20:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=14185#comment-1873</guid>
		<description>For sure, the idea of &quot;objectivity&quot; in journalism is hysterical and I&#039;m so sick of it being used as such a catchphrase. Though I don&#039;t agree with anything Fox says, I don&#039;t really have a problem with their existence. They know their audience. I can&#039;t even watch the local &quot;objective&quot; news anymore, because no matter how objective they try to present themselves, it&#039;s easy to see through it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For sure, the idea of &#8220;objectivity&#8221; in journalism is hysterical and I&#39;m so sick of it being used as such a catchphrase. Though I don&#39;t agree with anything Fox says, I don&#39;t really have a problem with their existence. They know their audience. I can&#39;t even watch the local &#8220;objective&#8221; news anymore, because no matter how objective they try to present themselves, it&#39;s easy to see through it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manny Furious</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/is-this-the-end-of-the-line-for-the-impartial-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-34655</link>
		<dc:creator>Manny Furious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=14185#comment-34655</guid>
		<description>For sure, the idea of &quot;objectivity&quot; in journalism is hysterical and I&#039;m so sick of it being used as such a catchphrase. Though I don&#039;t agree with anything Fox says, I don&#039;t really have a problem with their existence. They know their audience. I can&#039;t even watch the local &quot;objective&quot; news anymore, because no matter how objective they try to present themselves, it&#039;s easy to see through it. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For sure, the idea of &#8220;objectivity&#8221; in journalism is hysterical and I&#8217;m so sick of it being used as such a catchphrase. Though I don&#8217;t agree with anything Fox says, I don&#8217;t really have a problem with their existence. They know their audience. I can&#8217;t even watch the local &#8220;objective&#8221; news anymore, because no matter how objective they try to present themselves, it&#8217;s easy to see through it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Nolan</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/is-this-the-end-of-the-line-for-the-impartial-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-1806</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=14185#comment-1806</guid>
		<description>I agree that they seem to be asking this question rather late in the game. I also think Sean has a good point about objectivity. In some ways film makers like Michael Moore have parallels with writers like Hunter S. Thompson, Thomas Wolfe and George Plimpton etc. The New Journalism attempted to point out the inherent bias in so-called &quot;objective&quot; journalism and this new brand of doc similarly eschews such dubious standards for what may be a more honest approach....My two cents...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that they seem to be asking this question rather late in the game. I also think Sean has a good point about objectivity. In some ways film makers like Michael Moore have parallels with writers like Hunter S. Thompson, Thomas Wolfe and George Plimpton etc. The New Journalism attempted to point out the inherent bias in so-called &#8220;objective&#8221; journalism and this new brand of doc similarly eschews such dubious standards for what may be a more honest approach&#8230;.My two cents&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/is-this-the-end-of-the-line-for-the-impartial-documentary/comment-page-1/#comment-1803</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=14185#comment-1803</guid>
		<description>there will always be bias, weather it is in selection of topics, what evidence is presented and what is not, you will never  ever get the whole story from a single source, it isn&#039;t the fault of the journalist, it&#039;s the fault of the consumer being to stupid and lazy to keep looking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there will always be bias, weather it is in selection of topics, what evidence is presented and what is not, you will never  ever get the whole story from a single source, it isn&#39;t the fault of the journalist, it&#39;s the fault of the consumer being to stupid and lazy to keep looking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

