If you live in the US, the whole adjuvant argument is moot, as none of the US vaccines have them. If you live in Europe, they've been in use for years, with no evidence of major adverse events. Besides the deep, quasi-religious belief that synthetic = bad, natural = good, what evidence can you present? What autoimmune diseases are you talking about? Guillan Barre? A one-in-a-million phenomenon with flu vaccines? Do you realize that viral infections (like the flu) are far more likely to precipitate Guillan Barre? So if that's your biggest fear, I suggest you vaccinate yourself….

Follow the data, not the hype!

I suggest you check out this blog entry before laying more adulations on Sor Forcades: http://invitafidelis.blogspot.com/2009/11/myths...

P.S. I do not work for the WHO, and have no interest in a NWO…

L.M. Hennessy

Sorry, but this video is completely propaganda!

This “nun” (who wears slacks to interviews and, despite having a nun's vows is avidly pro-abortion) is an anti-pharmeceutical activist who distorts the truth or lies outright on many issues. She's written a book called “The Crimes of the Great Pharmaceutical Companies.” Hmmm… What do you expect her to say about this vaccine? She may have an MD degree, but she does not practice medicine, she has no experience with H1N1 patients. I do.

There are dozens of falsehoods in her interview, including how she distorts and lies about the H1N1 timeline from 1918-1957-1977-2009. (it's not the same strain, it didn't escape from a lab, the 1918 strain was recovered from an frozen Inuit Indian… in 1998 and sequenced in 2005, not in 1977), or how the WHO changed its definition of pandemic to not include mortality (it never included mortality because “pandemic” is an epidemiological term that has nothing to do with virulence) and that it did so to “order” countries to undertake forcible mass vaccinations (it never said that, and it cannot “order” because it has no legal capacity to do so), or stating that in Massachussets they will fine you $1,000 if you don't get vaccinated (anyone from MA can attest to this lie), or that you shouldn't take the vaccine because it will likely give you Guillan Barre syndrome (all flu vaccines carry about a 1 in 1 million risk of Guillan Barre. But considering there's about a 1 in 1,000 chance of death with flu, and that the flu itself is far more likely to precipitate Guillan Barre, which do you think is worse?). I could go on, including how she suspects Baxter tried to create an avian flu pandemic because one loony reporter said so, and filed a lawsuit (which, BTW also named Obama, Sibelius, Soros, NATO, WHO and even the UN as co-conspirators), but I'll stop here.

I challenge any who doubt me to check out this blog entry on the myths and facts of the vaccine:
http://invitafidelis.blogspot.com/2009/11/myths...

One other suggestion: at the end the screen shows names and websites but too fast for me, and possibly others, to catch. Could this info stay on the screen a bit longer? It's be useful.

Again, many thanks.

It frightens me to consider that the 'intent' may well be the elimination of our excess millions–maybe a billion or two? That people may actually be 'forced' by law to be vaccinated against their will. This would put smack in the heart of a police state! with no where else to escape to. Horrifying thought! As if GMO's and Monsanto weren't enough already! Lord help us, how close are we to such a state of affairs?
On the other hand, if left to its own inner dynamics as we are indeed doing, a growing population and its growing demands on infrastructure and planetary systems will soon enough decimate numbers without outside help. That there are those convinced global control by any means is their 'duty,' I do not doubt. But there is one agency, one force they cannot control and apparently haven't reckoned with. No, I don't mean airy-faerie or spiritual mumbo-jumbo stuff. I mean the down-on-earth impact we ourselves are having and the inevitable effects of that impact we are already experiencing–globally. On all fronts.

This version of the video has a glaring inaccuracy at the 5:16 mark. The inaccuracy is in the translation. I speak fluent Spanish and can guarantee you that Teresa says that there are “137 documented deaths, (she never says in Europe) and 3,600 cases of infection,” not 3,600 deaths worldwide like the translation reads….

thought you might care to know

Rafael with Evolver

Gracias por su información. En mi corazón sentí el no vacunar a mi familia. Como padre de 10 me preguntaba si había tomado la decisión correcta al no vacunar a mi familia. Su información realmente me confirma y me da tranquilidad.

Que Dios la bendiga!

Carlos Y Monica

“The “Spanish” influenza pandemic killed over 20 million people in 1918 and 1919, making it the worst infectious pandemic in history. Here, we report the complete sequence of the hemagglutinin (HA) gene of the 1918 virus. Influenza RNA for the analysis was isolated from a formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lung tissue sample prepared during the autopsy of a victim of the influenza pandemic in 1918. Influenza RNA was also isolated from lung tissue samples from two additional victims of the lethal 1918 influenza: one formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sample and one frozen sample obtained by in situ biopsy of the lung of a victim buried in permafrost since 1918. The complete coding sequence of the A/South Carolina/1/18 HA gene was obtained. The HA1 domain sequence was confirmed by using the two additional isolates (A/New York/1/18 and A/Brevig Mission/1/18). The sequences show little variation. Phylogenetic analyses suggest that the 1918 virus HA gene, although more closely related to avian strains than any other mammalian sequence, is mammalian and may have been adapting in humans before 1918.” PNAS February 16, 1999 vol. 96 no. 4 1651-1656

Second, the 1977 virus was actually a 1950 strain, not the 1918 strain, which may have escaped from a lab somewhere. Third, the NEJM article says “probably an accidental release”, not “established fact, as Sister Teresa says. Here is the misquoted passage from the actual NEJM article:

” Even though human influenza A (H1N1) virus had not circulated since 1957 and the swine influenza A (H1N1) virus that had been identified at Fort Dix did not extend outside the base, in November 1977, the H1N1 strain reemerged in the former Soviet Union, Hong Kong, and northeastern China. This strain affected primarily young people in a relatively mild presentation.18,30 Careful study of the genetic origin of the virus showed that it was closely related to a 1950 strain but dissimilar to influenza A (H1N1) strains from both 1947 and 1957. This finding suggested that the 1977 outbreak strain had been preserved since 1950.30 The reemergence was probably an accidental release from a laboratory source in the setting of waning population immunity to H1 and N1 antigens.19,31″

After this much error I quit listening. This is a classic case of an activist who is ending up putting her zealotry before the facts. I looked up Sister Teresa, who has written a book on the crimes and abuses of the pharmaceutical industry. I am no fan of that industry, and I do not give any of my time to their salesmen. (I am one of only 15% of doctors who decline to meet with drug reps.) However I think her failure to respect the facts taints whatever conspiracy theory she has come up with.