Either way, the climates of both Earth and Mars have fluctuated to much warmer and much colder temperatures due to concentrations of greenhouse gasses. The radiative transfer, energy balance, and physics, are all well understood.

In the future, though, if you plan to insult someone for making a mistake, you might wish to check your spelling and grammar first (3rd GRATER? venues? earth? But you capitalize Scientifically? I'm glad to see how well our education system is working out.

THE TRUTH OUT – THE 'SCIENTISTS' LIED TO PUSH THEIR GLOBAL WARMING AGENDA.

so much for that PhD!

Here's how it goes, http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c...

If his goal is to simply get the science discussed in court as a matter of public record, well, that's cool, I guess. I imagine there might have been a better way to do it.

I've read enough scientifically sound anti-anthro global warming to have my doubts as to the severity of man's impact on the Earth. But I do not doubt that we do, in fact, have an impact and a significant one.

The common sense view is that we are helping to accelerate an overall global climate change that was already taking place. I can get behind this.

I'm also behind analysis that says man kind cannot do anything to halt the climate change or really even slow it down. It's too late.

Things are going to suck sooner than they should have. Many species will not have time to react and will die off.

This is the nature of.. well, nature. There are these big cycles that we cannot help but be a part of.

Biodiversity is great but it is not something that can be maintained artificially.

If man stopped cutting down rain forests for cow pastures or crops, stopped dumping trash into the ocean, and made intelligent long term decisions, we could do a lot to help minimize the pain of climate change.

Some people criticize Al Gore for being set to make billions off of the tech he's pushing to help the Earth. So. That's capitalism.

Wind power, solar power, and geothermal power are effectively limitless. Nuclear power has a ridiculously high return on investment.

Clean coal, isn't. Oil reserves are dwindling. It may be 125 years before they run out, but it will be a few billion years before solar runs out.

I could care less about foreign vs. American oil. We shouldn't be focusing on oil, regardless.

On the other hand, if the Yellowstone super volcano were to explode, all of our tiny conservation efforts would mean exactly nothing.

By the way, the IPCC is an extremely conservative organization.

But we're not saying that the Earth is going to bake. CO2 has risen and so have global temperatures. Why is this being denied? Ask Exxon.