Comments on: Aetna Forcing 600,000 to Lose Coverage to Raise Profits http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/aetna-forcing-600000-to-lose-coverage-to-raise-profits/ alternative views, news & information—online, video and print Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:34:32 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Word Eater http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/aetna-forcing-600000-to-lose-coverage-to-raise-profits/comment-page-1/#comment-3385 Word Eater Sat, 05 Dec 2009 07:27:42 +0000 http://www.disinfo.com/?p=16431#comment-3385 So the take away is that insurance companies shouldn't be publicly traded, right?<br><br>Either that or every insurance plan could come with a few shares of stock in the providing company. So the take away is that insurance companies shouldn't be publicly traded, right?

Either that or every insurance plan could come with a few shares of stock in the providing company.

]]> By: Word Eater http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/aetna-forcing-600000-to-lose-coverage-to-raise-profits/comment-page-1/#comment-34296 Word Eater Sat, 05 Dec 2009 06:27:00 +0000 http://www.disinfo.com/?p=16431#comment-34296 So the take away is that insurance companies shouldn't be publicly traded, right? Either that or every insurance plan could come with a few shares of stock in the providing company. So the take away is that insurance companies shouldn’t be publicly traded, right?

Either that or every insurance plan could come with a few shares of stock in the providing company.

]]>