<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Wal-Mart &#8220;Shoplifting&#8221; Nightmare</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/another-wal-mart-shoplifting-nightmare/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/another-wal-mart-shoplifting-nightmare/</link>
	<description>alternative views, news &#38; information—online, video and print</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 01:34:32 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tuna Ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/another-wal-mart-shoplifting-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-3322</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuna Ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=16317#comment-3322</guid>
		<description>An online search didn&#039;t turn up much beyond the fact that the ruling took place on Oct. 07th, meaning the trial has been done with for some time.  There&#039;s no mention of any subpeona or motion of discovery, so the tape was likely never asked for.  I wonder how the dude found out about this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An online search didn&#39;t turn up much beyond the fact that the ruling took place on Oct. 07th, meaning the trial has been done with for some time.  There&#39;s no mention of any subpeona or motion of discovery, so the tape was likely never asked for.  I wonder how the dude found out about this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuna Ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/another-wal-mart-shoplifting-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-3319</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuna Ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=16317#comment-3319</guid>
		<description>Far be it from me to defend Wal-Mart or any security personell, but doesn&#039;t this story seem a trifle one-sided?  The descriptions of the arrest are sensationalized to the point of inaccuracy (an arm bar to take down a 15 year-old girl?  That&#039;s not what an arm bar does, do they mean a stiff arm?), and the article is from a dude writing an anti-Wal Mart book...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have no love for Wal-Mart, except as a place from which (contrary to the story) one can easily steal things without any questioning of the morality of one&#039;s actions, but I have a deep and abiding hatred for misinformation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Far be it from me to defend Wal-Mart or any security personell, but doesn&#39;t this story seem a trifle one-sided?  The descriptions of the arrest are sensationalized to the point of inaccuracy (an arm bar to take down a 15 year-old girl?  That&#39;s not what an arm bar does, do they mean a stiff arm?), and the article is from a dude writing an anti-Wal Mart book&#8230;</p>
<p>I have no love for Wal-Mart, except as a place from which (contrary to the story) one can easily steal things without any questioning of the morality of one&#39;s actions, but I have a deep and abiding hatred for misinformation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tuna Ghost</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/another-wal-mart-shoplifting-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-34607</link>
		<dc:creator>Tuna Ghost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=16317#comment-34607</guid>
		<description>An online search didn&#039;t turn up much beyond the fact that the ruling took place on Oct. 07th, meaning the trial has been done with for some time.  There&#039;s no mention of any subpeona or motion of discovery, so the tape was likely never asked for.  I wonder how the dude found out about this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An online search didn&#8217;t turn up much beyond the fact that the ruling took place on Oct. 07th, meaning the trial has been done with for some time.  There&#8217;s no mention of any subpeona or motion of discovery, so the tape was likely never asked for.  I wonder how the dude found out about this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Word Eater</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/another-wal-mart-shoplifting-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-3313</link>
		<dc:creator>Word Eater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 03:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=16317#comment-3313</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not just Wal-mart and it is more common than you would like to believe.  Usually, it&#039;s managers forcing younger &lt;i&gt;employees&lt;/i&gt; to stay and not allowing them to leave.  Kids are in danger because they are often physically less powerful than the adults lording authority over them; they can also be less likely to question an &quot;adult&quot; telling them they have to do something; they do not know their rights as well as an adult and may be afraid to exercise them for fear of getting in trouble.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is sad but true.  These companies, these people think of the places they manage as their own little fiefdom and treat employees (and apparently customers) accordingly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s not just Wal-mart and it is more common than you would like to believe.  Usually, it&#39;s managers forcing younger <i>employees</i> to stay and not allowing them to leave.  Kids are in danger because they are often physically less powerful than the adults lording authority over them; they can also be less likely to question an &#8220;adult&#8221; telling them they have to do something; they do not know their rights as well as an adult and may be afraid to exercise them for fear of getting in trouble.</p>
<p>It is sad but true.  These companies, these people think of the places they manage as their own little fiefdom and treat employees (and apparently customers) accordingly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xen</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/another-wal-mart-shoplifting-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-3310</link>
		<dc:creator>xen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 02:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=16317#comment-3310</guid>
		<description>This is one of those instances where the more litigious you are, the better it will be for everyone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of those instances where the more litigious you are, the better it will be for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hunter C Coch</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/another-wal-mart-shoplifting-nightmare/comment-page-1/#comment-3304</link>
		<dc:creator>Hunter C Coch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=16317#comment-3304</guid>
		<description>One more, of the many reasons not to shop at the Wall-mart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more, of the many reasons not to shop at the Wall-mart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

