DISCUSS (2)

Report: U.S. Fears Public Scrutiny Would Scuttle IP Treaty Talks

Posted by Raymond on December 5, 2009

From Wired:

The proposed Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement, or ACTA, has been shrouded in secrecy, and the Bush and the Obama administrations have declared it unsuitable for public debate because divulging its contents could harm America’s “national security.”

A few recent leaks have showed that the unfinished agreement, which is being negotiated largely between the European Union and the United States, is likely to benefit the content industry. At the same time, it might pave the way for international guidelines that could lead to consumers losing their internet accounts if they are believed to be digital copyright scofflaws.

But we now know that the real reason for secrecy, the one suspected all along, was that the United States does not think it could reach an accord with Europe and the nearly dozen other nations if the proposal came under public scrutiny.

[Read more at Wired]

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Posted in: , , , ,  
  • emperorreagan

    What, people might be upset if they found out that Obama was basically pushing a treaty written by entertainment lawyers that would impose whatever draconian regulation they wanted on the internet?

    Mr. Transparency has been anything but. Anyone-but-Bush has brought a lot more of exactly the same old games to the table. He just comes across as nicer doing it, instead of coming across like an impish school boy.

  • Word Eater

    Strike one. Be careful what you say.