Comments on: Study Links Soda and Pancreatic Cancer

By: Sean

Sean — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:15:01 +0000

I wish they'd go back to sugar here,
I don't drink soda that much but when I do the sugar tastes so much better

By: Sean

Sean — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:15:00 +0000

I wish they’d go back to sugar here,
I don’t drink soda that much but when I do the sugar tastes so much better

By: jbbradley

jbbradley — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 21:04:40 +0000

Easily! They outsourced the study to Mexico, or India, where coke and pepsi products contain sugar instead of HFCS. Pepsi and Coke don't want to go near a HFCS study, and I'm sure this is an underhanded ploy to push HFCS on the rest of their customers world wide. I personally only drink mexican coke. Mainly because it tastes better, but also very hard to find – therefore, less consumption (like once a month).

By: ron

ron — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:09:12 +0000

In as much as most all soda does not have sugar in it but high fructose corn syrup, which is metabolized in the liver and not the pancreas, I do not understand how this study reached its results.

By: bryan_85

bryan_85 — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 04:48:18 +0000

one reason why the head of whole foods market is against universal healthcare, not because of some sort of left-right agenda but because he thinks that if everyone ate/lived healthy then we wouldn't need so much spending on healthcare. even though i am a supporter of national healthcare, though not a fan of the “obamacare”, he is right about eating/living healthy lives.

By: Sean

Sean — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:55:24 +0000

the thing is , you cut everything you enjoy out of your life,
sure you live longer, but that life starts to feel like a sentence not a joy.

By: jon

jon — Wed, 10 Feb 2010 03:53:08 +0000

Chalk up another one into the No-Shit-Sherlock category.
Not only does soda offer Zero health benefits, it's worse – it offers Negative health “benefits”