DISCUSS (93)

Lady Gaga: Puppet of Illuminati Mind Control?

Posted by ralph on March 18, 2010

Lady Gaga TelephoneDisinformation World News first “uncovered” this Illuminati plot back in August of last year. Here’s more analysis from Max Fisher of Vigilant Citizen’s The Hidden Meaning of Lady Gaga’s “Telephone” on the Atlantic Wire. Check out the video below and make up your own mind…

ALLEGATION: Lady Gaga is a pawn of the Illuminati and a peddler of the occult. Her music video “Telephone” is a brazen attempt at recruiting teenagers into mind control programs.

LADY GAGA IS: “A mind-controlled drone who kills people”

“TELEPHONE” VIDEO IS ABOUT: “Ritual murder of average Americans in a diner by mind-controlled slaves” and “mind control, a covert practice used by the military, the CIA, religious cults and the Illuminati elite. It is used to program human beings to become mental slaves and to execute specific tasks.”

LYRICAL EVIDENCE: “By ‘kinda busy’, Gaga means she has dissociated from reality. Real life is calling her brain but she ‘has no service’, she’s not there. Gaga is not thinking or talking for herself anymore, her head and her heart have been dissociated from her core personality due to [Illuminati/CIA] Monarch programming.”

Listen to “The Lady Gaga Code” on Disinformation World News

Read Vigilant Citizen’s The Hidden Meaning of Lady Gaga’s “Telephone”

Read Max Fisher’s analysis on the Atlantic Wire

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Lady MaMa

    oh such conspiracy theory bullshit! get over yourself! shes just a performer..and a very amazing talented one, at that. so every talented person on the planet is an mind controlled drone? lol! who writes this crap? fundamentalist christians masquerading as real people? lol! i dont believe a christian is a real person. the drones are the christians!! hahaha! hows that for some conspiracy here? you're all whacked! get a life!

  • radiac

    Quite entertaining, but one thing we know for certain: she is guilty of putting out terrible, terrible music. I suppose you could call it a conspiracy.

  • Andrew

    i disagree with lady mama, because lady gaga Suuucks. But yeah, this stuff is bullshit propped up by a fundamentalists pre-conceived idea's. Vigilant Citizen starts with a conclusion and then tries to assemble a “logical” explanation of how to prove their conclusion. It's crap and so is the site. She is a performer (albeit a crap one). . . period.

  • nyxynox

    Francis Dec Anyone?
    Gangster Computer God worldwide SECRET CONTAINMENT POLICY, made possible SOLY by worldwide Computer God Frankenstein Controls, especially LIFELONG CONSTANT THRESHOLD BRAIN WASH RADIO ( quiet and motionless, I can slightly hear it; repeatedly this has saved my life on the streets ). FOUR BILLION worldwide population ALL living have a Computer God CONTAINMENT POLICY BRAIN BANK BRAIN, A REAL BRAIN, in the Brain Bank Cities on the far side of the Moon, we never see. Primarily, based on your lifelong Frankenstein radio controls, especially, your eyesight T.V. (sight, and sound) recorded by your brain. YOUR Moon BRAIN of the Computer God, activates your Frankenstein Threshold Brain Wash Radio LIFELONG, inculcating conformist propaganda, even frightening you and mixing you-up and the USUAL, “DON'T WORRY ABOUT IT.” for your set backs, mistakes even when you receive deadly injuries. THIS IS THE WORLDWIDE COMPUTER GOD SECRET CONTAINMENT POLICY.

    Sounds kinda simliar?

  • dumbsaint

    I find it interesting that she allows herself to be seen ugly. The music is horrible though, I thought everyone agreed that vocoders were for people who couldn't sing back in 1995.

  • Zel

    Lady Mama… Christians aren't real people? Lady Gaga is talented?…. wow… just from those two statements enough has been said about you.

  • Hadrian999

    does anyone have the nerve to post on a real account?

  • Hadrian999

    she is brilliant at what she does, get media attention and rake in bucks

  • radiac

    True dat. I have the sudden urge to buy a Virgin mobile phone.

  • GoodDoktorBad

    Dumb, plastic, low brow, pre-pubescent attitude in a post pubescent body. Lady Ga Ga. Another “dumb whore” personna for all the dumb little girls to emulate. We are all doomed….

  • Zel

    Sure, I will sign in just for you :) because that changes what I have to say… ?

  • Hadrian999

    if you have to hide to say it, yes it does

  • http://www.myspace.com/caramelcorpse Schweí K. Übersteigen

    Thats kind of a leap in''t it..

  • Tuna Ghost

    I find these accusations about pop music fairly common, and I'm constantly confused by them. Plastic? As compared to what? What does that mean in musical terms, and why is it a bad thing? Low brow? Hard to get much more low-brow than a great deal of rock music since the seventies, and I bet none of us are willing to say rock is worse for it. Examining her lyrics, I find that they're hadly “pre-pubescent”. Why do you think so, herr doktor?

    I'm not sure why you mention any “dumb whore” personna, I'm quite positive that is neither the effect she's aiming for or the one she's actually putting out to the world (yourself aside, but you're obviously a special case). She's a talented songwriter and performer and savvy enough to turn that into mountains of media attention and money for her label. I'm honestly confused where you're getting this “dumb whore” idea.

  • Tuna Ghost

    I would do so, just to counter the notion that nobody who says controversial things ever does so from a user account, but I've forgotten my login information and the school I teach at blocks AOL for some reason (yes, I'm the last man under thirty who still uses an AOL email address). They also block the The Onion, the Telegraph, New Yorker and Men's Health. I'm not sure what they're using as their standard.

  • Hadrian999

    nothing wrong with girls emulating whores in my book

  • GoodDoktorBad

    Plastic= fake, contrived, shallow, lacking substance and originality, all image and hype -little talent. Plastic.
    Low brow= people that call themselves “bitches” and expect to be taken seriously…. and also the people that take it seriously. See also “dumb whore”
    Dumb whore= savvy enough to turn her tits into gold, her voice always has a synth on it (see plastic) so where is the talent? I've met strippers with more self respect and danced better too. Since when are ” mountains of media attention and money for her label” something I or anybody else should give a crap about? Why should we be impressed with this? Pull your head out of Lady Ga ga's ass and wipe off the Ca-ca Papa…

  • GoodDoktorBad

    See ya on Jerry Springer?

  • Hadrian999

    is that still on?
    but seriously, more whorish girls more casual sex, everybody wins

  • Tuna Ghost

    I guess I'm having trouble with the idea that having a public image (which is never the real person) is a bad thing. Anyone and everyone who is in the media long enough will have an “image”, and I don't see the reasoning behind why manipulating that is a bad thing. Are we pulling her up on the fact that, in her day-to-day life, she DOESN'T prance around in weird outfits to a backround of special effects, like her videos (personally, I wouldn't be surprised to discover that she does)? That she uses the concept of a person as a brand to her advantage? I think the “contrived” charge comes from a bullshit notion of authenticity, that somehow “real” people don't dress up or indulge in fashion and style or image. I have a lot to say on this, but since no one asked I'll sum up: it's pretty ridiculous.

    “Shallow” I think can be refuted by her lyrics (not all of them, of course, but enough that some of her songs have depth).

    Your use of “low brow” doesn't fit with the common usage, and I'm not sure what it has to do with people who self-identify as bitches. Regarding the “dumb whore” comment, you claimed that was her persona; yet that isn't what she's aiming for. Claiming that she profits from her attractiveness (”tits into gold”) can be easily refuted by the fact that everyone knows that she has a face like she owes someone money. Chist, she's famous for it. It's the second thing my students (who are fascinated by pop stars, as is most of South Korea) say about her.

    I can't imagine how you've ascertained her level of self-respect. Frankly I'm baffled at this.

    Her voice is occasionally synthesized, but that doesn't mean she can't sing or hasn't sung sans synth. I've heard her do so. There are recordings of it. She has been trained. She has talent, or skill, or whatever it is you get from practicing a lot.

    I mean, “dumb whore”. Really? Where is the dumb? Where is the whore? You haven't given me either, unless selling an image is considered prostitution, in which case the vice unit will be knocking down half our doors I suspect.

  • Tuna Ghost

    You mean casual sex in exchange for money. I don't know about you, but that sort of takes the fun out of it for me.

  • Hadrian999

    nope that would be a business arrangement, not casual

  • Tuna Ghost

    Well like they say, “it ain't whoring unless there's $$$ involved”. I don't know who actually says that, but the point stands. If you think Lady Gaga is encouraging girls to be more casual about sex, not acutally the literal interpretation of “whorish”, well…um…shit, maybe she is. Should we buy her a card?

  • GoodDoktorBad

    Can you here an echo? Let me know the condition of the Ga ga colon while you're up in there. We can sell it to the paparazzi for fun and profit.

  • GoodDoktorBad

    Duuuuuh……

  • http://www.disinfo.com ralph

    I think this is the best acting I have ever seen Beyoncé do…

  • Tuna Ghost

    I like how pointing out flaws in your reasoning equates to me loving Lady Gaga (obviously, only someone who loves her would bother to defend her, yes?). I also love how, after having point after point knocked down, you have no way to counter anything I've said. This deconstruction is for your own good, Doktor. Remember, initiation never ends.

  • GoodDoktorBad

    If I don't buy into the “talent” that is lady ga ga, what makes you think I should buy into your bullshit? Who can even tell what your opinion is on anything, when all you do is rag on the semantics of other people opinions?
    You make asumptions about your own intelligence that you assume I should just accept, perhaps because you are used to the bully pulpit of the classroom. Deconstruct all you like, as for you being the MC of initiation, forgive me if I miss that show.

    If you like, love or whatever, you can believe that you've won some battle with me. Claim your fantasy victory oh, champion of GA GA.
    Besides, you've already conceded to my “reasoning” (which is really just opinion anyway, as you seem to often forget) when you wrote to Hadrian999:

    “Well like they say, “it ain't whoring unless there's $$$ involved”. I don't know who actually says that, but the point stands. If you think Lady Gaga is encouraging girls to be more casual about sex, not acutally the literal interpretation of “whorish”, well…um…shit, maybe she is. Should we buy her a card?”

    Stop playing like you don't know what I'm talking about, if you didn't you couldn't have wrote that.
    “well…um…shit, maybe she is” Pleeeez………

  • jsh

    i know its terrible but i can't stop listening……..perhaps it is mind controlling hahaha

  • AustinoFicino

    Alas, as with all such stories, it quickly becomes clear that no two people are speaking about the same Illuminati. I, for one, am inclined to believe that Lady Gaga is far more intentional and autonomous an agent than the Vigilant Citizen, and that her performances demonstrate her dada-fashion-voodoo's power to transfix the mind like a train wreck and a willingness to capitalize on that fact. In one sense the Illuminati refers to those who have grokked some principle or understanding that is technical, exclusive, and powerful. Lady Gaga's Jabot collar fashion-crimes manage to freak the norms, subvert the dominant paradigm, and make her a lot of money. Poor Max Fisher doesn't realize that the Game is sometimes simpler than he realizes, and that he's played right into it. Now who's the puppet of the Illuminati?

    I'd try the same shtick, but I don't think I could pull off a dress made of Kermit The Frog heads.

  • DeepCough

    I don't anything about this “Illuminati mind control” nonsense. All I noticed were product placements for Virgin Mobile, Diet Coke, and Polaroid. Also, I noticed a Kill Bill Vol.1 reference (i.e. look for the yellow truck).

  • corey

    People are starting to sound a little crazy lately. People that speak about the Illuminati don't really even know who they are. PEOPLE WAKE UP the new world order is all about RELIGION. One world Governemnt / one world religion is the VATICAN…

    LADY GAGA IS: “A mind-controlled drone who kills people”

    Really???? what planet are you from?
    I see no connection between lady gaga and the illuminati. SHEEESH

  • jhvh

    I think the GoodDoktor is speaking hyperbolically to make a point, it just appears that you are incapable of comprehending his humor. Also, tunaghost, you are the one who obviously doesn't understand what the term lowbrow means (–not highly intellectual or cultured). Not only are gaga, beyonce and this trite little video lowbrow, but pop music, in general, is the epitome of lowbrow; it panders to the lowest common denominator. As a musician, it is fairly easy to see how elementary and uninspired the majority of pop music is; it is a formulaic science, not an art form. And while we're milling over terms you don't seem to understand, let's talk about whores and prostitution. Whoring out yourself or your “art” to corporations like coke and virgin mobile . . . sucking four cocks in a back-alley for twenty bucks couldn't make you more of a prostitute than that. I understand what you're trying to say though, I don't think gaga is consciously selling herself as a whore-idol for little girls, she is probably under the delusion that she is inspiring girls to be independent and unique . . . the only problem is that she is doing so by looking, acting, talking, and dressing like a half-witted stripper. Also, how in the world can you claim that some of her lyrics are intelligent and then tell us you're a teacher??? Thank God you teach in Korea, and no ones' children I know will have to be taught by some pompous know-it-all who doesn't even understand what the term–intelligent means. I'll admit that she may be able to sing, but that means almost absolutely nothing. Singers are like actors, they're a dime a dozen, they are merely the paint that the artist strokes onto canvass to create his masterpiece. I could produce her entire album with a laptop: it's a joke. If you need a literary comparison to help you understand where gaga stands in the music world, here you go, she's like a drugstore harlequin romance novel: only suitable for 12 year-old girls and half-retarded housewives.
    Now, do I agree with this whole illuminati conspiracy? Not really. Any people who are asleep enough to indulge in such empty soulless entertainment don't need to be controlled by the illuminati because they're already under control, they're already mindless robot consumers perpetuating the evil corporate game. Things like gaga and pop music just keep the clueless uninformed sheep clueless and uninformed . . . if you're awake, don't bother wasting your time on it.

  • Loves To Spooge

    Seriously?!

  • Mabus

    This is a video response to: “Lady Gaga: Dude in a Plastic Dress.”

    She truly must be some kind of witch, having paired the musical abilities of Katy Perry (her actual abilities, not the gaggle of pros that make her seem like an actual musician), the 'been there done that 10 years ago with Madonna' schtick, and yet somehow still manages to get her name everywhere I go, even disinfo. And all while being the 'best kept Tranny secret of 2009', thoroughly beating out Anne Coulter after her having a seeming monopoly on the contest for years.

    Frankly Jay-Z is more interesting with his 'I'm going to name drop the Masons every other line' act. Knowing his audience I expect to homies in both NASCAR jackets AND a fez very soon.

    If we stop saying her name like she's actually someone worth thinking about, she'll magically go away, to the same “People were deluded into thinking I was important, for awhile” living-hellscape that Debby Gibson, Jessica Simpson, et al currently reside in. The only 'power' she has is the attention the public gives her instead of ridiculing her trite little pop game that would have been oh-so-slick back when floppy drives equaled the current prestige of iPods.

  • Hannah

    You guys are overthinking this wayyy too much. Really.

  • Mr. Man

    Well, I'm not sure Lady Gaga is the best vehicle for things like this, even if it weren't coming from the tinfoil crowd. I know she's popular in the Gay community, for some reason.

    I don't think she's a he, or even that she's a she though. Has anyone ever seen her in person? Alien Space Lizard? Data's gender bending offspring? Some hideous parody brought to life by CGI?

  • Jay

    It's just in contrast to GaGa's atrocious acting skills.

  • dana

    I don't know about 'Illuminati', but now I want to transfer phone service to Virgin, get a date on 'Plenty of Fish', eat a honey bun, and then make a sandwich with Wonder Bread.
    I have never seen so much product placement in a video

  • researchb4uspeak

    wooooow…..it seems like everyone has gotten WAY off topic when it comes to the illuminati conspiracy. The goal of the illuminati is simply to dissociate people from religion and their own personal values; long story short, the farther we can get them away from any standards of virtue, the more chaos there will be, and the better it will be when someone steps up and becomes the 'savior' leader of it all. The illuminati hoped to abolish Christianity and any other form of religion so no one would rise up to overthrow them if they ever came to some power and hope to establish one New World government. The illuminati has never been proven, only NOTICED; this is because they are a SECRET society, duh…so they use 'front groups' to infiltrate the government and media (basically everything we rely on these days) to influence to a 'freethinking, chaotic, rebellious' train of thought. People are just now noticing it in the music industry because of all the blatant symbolism, which is kinda sad cause its been there for decades. It's not only in America either, but it seems to be easier done here because of how easily we lap up almost anything the media gives us=basically the more we can get people relating to songs, movies, and tv shows about casual sex, violence, and drugs & alcohol and then even screwing with ReALiTy a little (notice how news broadcasting stations choose what they feel is most *appropriate* to talk about at the moment?) the closer we are to screwing up their sense of order and what is right. If someone is reading this and is saying : well hell, they're doing a fucked up job cause the music is crap, as any 8 to 16 year old what they think about how 'awesome' some of their idols are. The idea is to get the YOUTH since they easiest manipulated. Music's only part in all this is to promote sexuality, symbolism, and drugs, and alcohol; the banks and members of the federal government are doing the rest……………………..

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Elliott-Hazelbaker/519860830 Elliott Hazelbaker

    Am I really the only one who agrees with this? I think VigilantCitizen's theories are extremely credible. Read some of his other articles and it won't seem so crazy.

  • http://www.facebook.com/ableground John Molina

    I thought the whole murder in the diner thing was simply alluding to how bad diner food is for you.

    These theories about Gaga are far fetched to say the least. If it's true, then take me to the Illuminati Disco.

    Negative points for disinfo.

  • Tuna Ghost

    It's tempting for musicians to dismiss pop music, I know this because for most of my teens and well after I had the same opinion. “Pandering” is a difficult charge to prove, however–it assumes that Lady Gaga doesn't enjoy the music herself, or the act of making it, only shilling it out to the clueless masses, which I don't think you can prove (it may be true, but even so having been a professional musician, I can say with confidence that making a dollar sometimes means playing music you don't particularly feel like playing that day). The argument of complexity doesn't stand, either–punk music is comparatively easier to create and perform, but I'd be surprised to hear anyone here rag on it for that. The criticism, as I noted earlier, usually comes from some bullshit notion of “authenticity”. Where yours comes from, I can't say. You didn't really explain anything, only vented your opinions on the matter.

    Re: her lyrics, I don't recall ever using the term “intelligent”, only that some of her lyrics have depth. There is a difference.

    As for her product placement, I think you'll find that some of your favorite films had a product placement deal going on. It's part of being in the media. If you call this “whoring”, you're going to get a nosebleed way up there on your high-horse. Also it reduces the very real dangers of the sex trade to a joke.

    Man I was just waiting for you to bust out “sheeple”, but you didn't…shame. Also, I'd venture you're just as caught in a mindset as the rest of the asleep people, Neo.

  • Tuna Ghost

    I think if you pay special attention to the actual, literal interpretation of what I wrote, you may realize that I ascertained that Hadrian999 wasn't actually talking about prostitution, only casual sex (not the same, as he points out in his own post). I'm not sure where you're seeing a discrepancy. I'm all for a more relaxed attitude about sex. I write with the idea that words have meaning, not leaving it up to reader to guess “what I mean”. This isn't a conversation, face to face, where there are all sorts of cues to clue in the listener as to what's going on inside your mind. This is an internet forum where all we have are words, so lets be precise in our use of them, eh?

    As for my bully pulpit, it's full of children that don't speak English, so let's not get carried away. I earned this pretentious tone, by god, I didn't get it by lecturing children. I occasionally use for that, though, as current circumstances demonstrate admirably. But enough about my personal life, as it doesn't have much to do with Lady Gaga or her apparent sins.

  • GoodDoktorBad

    “I earned this pretentious tone, by god”
    You know, I had reserved some respect for you in the past because I thought you were at least knowledgable about some things, but I can see now that your ego is far more spacious than any usefull knowledge you may possess or impart.
    While I'm already aware that I am indeed a hypocrite at times, its obvious you are adept at deflecting any real responsibility for you own hypocrisy.
    So, I realize I have been the fool indeed by continuing to debate you on matters of opinion, especially because
    you so often debate them as matters of fact. Its pretty obvious that “winning” to pleasurably inflate your head is the most important thing to you. In that arena in your head, there is only one person clapping -you….

  • http://www.johnkanesmith.com/ John Kane Smith

    I think your giving her a little too much credit…

  • Gaga

    Its to trick u to think that is cool to follow the measseage that the pop culture gives u. Be us we tell u is cool.

  • Devin

    This is all hilarious. How do some people get so preoccupied by the most trivial of things

  • davakins

    good grief!! This slut make Madonna look like Harriet Nelson. The moral of the video is……THERE ARE NO FUCKING MORALS!! Mommies, keep your kids away from the tv, cause its out to KEEL YOU!!

  • JP

    Show us your Kermit outfit and let us be the judge Austin!