Warren Ellis on The DisinfoCast with Matt Staggs
The Problem With Moderates
Sean Hannity Vs. An Occupy Wall Street Organizer (Video)
DISCUSS (5)

3rd Beam Lights Up NYC Skyline for WTC 7

Posted by Camron Wiltshire on September 14, 2010

3-BeamFrom Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth via 911 Truth News:

At 9:11 pm on the 9th anniversary of the September attacks, the members of the 1280 strong Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth lit up the skies over Manhattan with a towering 2 billion-candlepower beam of light to raise public awareness that three, not just two, World Trade Center highrise buildings collapsed symmetrically at near freefall acceleration on 9/11, though only two were hit by planes.

‘Why is there a Third Beam in my skyline?’ New Yorkers are asking tonight. Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth founder Richard Gage, AIA, who held a press conference earlier in the day at the now-rebuilt WTC 7 with victims family members, states “The people of New York need to see the light – that a third WTC skyscraper not hit by any plane was destroyed on Sept. 11. They have been deceived about what happened on that terrible day. We are shining the spotlight, literally, on the fact that the official story of what happened at Ground Zero simply cannot be true and that a truly independent new investigation is needed both as a matter of national security and as the key to justice for the victims of the Twin Towers.”

“Building 7 is a ‘Smoking Gun of the 9/11 crime scene” Gage said. “We hope that after tonight, New Yorkers will see September 11th in a whole new light.”

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Dallas Nothing

    Get em’ Gage! The beams were a good idea, only I highly doubt most people are capable of putting 2 and 2 together… Maybe could have added like a Batman light but with “911 inside job” instead of a bat! I dunno, it’s been 9 years… And still public ignorance over rules real issues. I mean come on, the Mosque and Koran thing were a blatant attempt to distract everyone… Again. Someone should write an article on each year since 911, pointing out each years new distraction… P.S. the wikileaks docs are just more half truths embedded in lies and propaganda. Assange is a puppet, just wait, you’ll all see eventually.

  • Butter Knife

    Alternatively, things happened pretty much the way “they” say they did, and the real space for conspiracy is in the planning, preparation and perpetration phases.

    This would require significantly fewer conspirators, less secrets, and requires no explanation as to how and when conspiracy agents managed to perform a complicated and rather obvious controlled demolition without anyone noticing. However unlikely it may seem that hijacked airliners collapsed the WTC, it is substantially less likely that something else did it.

  • Andrew

    Alternatively, American culture is both exo-toxic and auto-toxic, and was psychologically programmed to self-destruct upon an event like 9/11.

  • Dallas Nothing

    Whoops, accidentally clicked “like” lol. I see where your coming from…. But I’ve researched the events of 911 as much as possible and the results are disturbing… I cant say I got to examine physical evidence or “interrogate” anyone that I believe to be involved… But yeah, the official story is garbage (maybe purposefully made to start public disorder based on mistrust of the government?) I don’t care what anyone says, IT DOESN’T TAKE A WHOLE LOT OF BODIES TO HIJACK A PLANE AND PLANT EXPLOSIVES. And it sure didn’t take much for the mainstream media to TRASH and smear every whistleblower involved. So, yeah. I don’t settle as easily as you butter. No offense.

  • Synapse

    “I cant say I got to examine physical evidence or “interrogate” anyone that I believe to be involved” – This is exactly the problem. You could say you don’t buy the official story, but it’s not as if there’s anything else you have to go on. The only thing you have are some questions. Good, ask, but there isn’t anything tangible outside videos with spooky music voice overs. Most of the accusations relating to anything scientific is answerable. “What if” statements are eternally theoretical.

    What’s more reasonable?

    1. A bunch of pissed off Muslims manage to walk into the country, learn to fly, steal a plane via lax security and passive hostages, and then carry out their 50 year old tradition of suicide bombing via plane with a fairly incompetent government reacting by lashing out at Afghanistan, who then takes advantage of the situation by moving on to Iraq to “finish” the job they started 20 years ago.

    or

    2. A world power brilliantly bombs itself somehow without anyone (with real access to the evidence) realizing it in the most flawlessly executed plan ever with no leaks nearly 10 years later, then uses the opportunity to screw up it’s next two wars into a super-massive quagmire and tanks the economy in 8 years.

    I’m sorry, but option 2 is insane and completely contradictory.