DISCUSS (55)

Thermite Compound Found in World Trade Center Dust

Posted by A. Listro on January 17, 2011

An article published by The Open Chemical Physics Journal in 2009 details that a team of scientists lead by a Danish University of Copenhagen researcher have found traces of what appears to be unreacted and partially reacted super-thermite, or nano-thermite, in four different samples of the World Trade Center dust collected by eyewitnesses. The unique compound shows immense reactivity to heat and ejects the same iron-rich spheroids observed in the ignition of commercial thermite.

An English-subtitled Danish television interview with the lead researcher, Niels Harrit, who believes that the discovery of this thermite compound implies foul play, is shown below, followed by an abstract from the research paper.

Abstract: We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later.

The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 ˚C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Posted in: , , ,  
  • ArgosyJones
  • ArgosyJones

    group of over 1500 scientists

  • Tuna Ghost

    I’d like to watch that, but since i don’t live in the States I can’t. Describe it for me?

  • ArgosyJones

    It’s an old episode of a 60’s saturday morning cartoon, The Rocky and Bullwinke Show. In this episode, the bad guy is trying to get the secret formula for Hushaboom, the silent explosive. Silent explosives are kind of a contradiction in terms and I suppose they wouldn’t show up on the seismograph either (they are a key element in some 9/11 conspiracy theories though). I guess it isn’t that funny when I try to explain it.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_M6F3RJVEWJ24QKMCHFNVK7ADVE Winston Smith

    so obviously an inside job! When I read below that people argue that wt7 could fall in the manner observed naturally from office fires ir blows my mind. Freefall can ONLY occur if all the supports are simultaneously removed. (why would a building’s collapse exhibit every characteristic of a controlled demolition if it were not one, especially he only times those features have ever been present was in CT’s?

    The North Tower antenna does the same thing, no jolt. No conservation of momentum,proving it could not possibly have been gravity driven collapse. This is physics. There are no exceptions. And it becomes very painfully obvious by NIST’s behavior amd the Bush admin’s reluctance to even investigate, the disposal of the structural steel, etc that this was an inside job.

    Attacking the Harrit paper by saying the editor quit in protest (or betham itself) is just a foolish distraction..
    and does not address it’s findings. All samples tested contained high-tech advance engineered aluminothermic explosives! what the hell? NOT paint chips. address that.

    You think gravity caused that level of damage to to the twin towers? The buildings got progressively stronger as they went down. The core columns got thicker (at the base, the larger core box columns were almost 53″ of solid steel each) it is simply impossible for the top smaller part of the building to crush all the lower section and remain intact. Look at the work of
    http://911speakout.org/?page_id=8
    and
    http://911speakout.org/?page_id=10

    the evidence is simply overwhelming and irrefutable.Those structures could support many times their real world weights..and the level of energy in their destruction of 1&2 (the speed and symmetry and thoroughness of destruction, the excessive heat, pulverized concrete (resulting in 1100 missing bodies and tens of thousands of body parts blasted for blocks in every direction, the 99 days underground fires, molten metal, etc) ALL reveal explosives. Lots and lots of explosives