Daniele Bolelli Vs. Joe Rogan: Round 2
How Your Cat Is Making You Crazy
Top Five Regrets Of The Dying
DISCUSS (114)

Joe Rogan On WTC 7 And The Military Industrial Complex

Posted by Camron Wiltshire on March 22, 2011

Joe Rogan "Building 7 looks like a controlled demolition"

Joe Rogan takes on the Military Industrial Complex and questions World Trade Center Building 7′s Immaculate Collapse.

Thank you Joe Rogan! I hope you can convince many of the young warriors in MMA of the difference between Warriors and Soldiers. Soldiers do what they are told, Warriors make their own fate.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
← Older Comments
  • LCD USMC

    how about you just post somewhere else son.

  • LCD USMC

    The 911 commission report is a 592 page paperback book – the NIST report is roughly 28 chapters online plus a photo gallery. each chapter or pdf is lengthy or say the least. its not an easy read. No i don’t have a hard copy . Its taken quite some time. I’m not even done yet.

    Are you a NYer? I am – you’d have seen the buildings that DIDNT fall but were on fire. You don’t have to be a scientist to see something is really wrong there. Firefighters and police officers talk about Molten Steel. Your air defenses told to stand down. do you know the SOP for a flight being out of contact with ATC?
    Or a building collapse?

    Tell me – what other building has fallen from fire? the Nist report didn’t say it fall because a building fell on it. It said debris from the building set the floors on fire, expanding steel beams only being on fire for less than a day. that the floors from 5-8 offered no resistance. What blew up the bottom of building 7’s Lobby? Asymmetrical damage causing symmetrical free fall. not exactly probable. If i kick you in your leg you won’t fall straight down. you’ll lean in the direction of the injury.

    but talking with me wont change your mind. All youcan do is question me. You’ve not read any of this stuff because you’re not even questioning it. All you can question is my looking over this material. I’m sorry

    You should take a look at the ground truth a book written by John Farmer Senior advisory of the 9/11 commission report. Or Pentagate. I’m attempting to set up a Formal Debate at Georgia Tech.

  • 1776

    Its in our brains :]

  • American_girl

    Lol – you clearly can’t answer that question. the answer is none. The only time in history was all on one day. 3 buildings and one didn’t even make it into the official 9/11 report. I’m saying there is a cover up. Its been used to launch 3 illegal wars. spy on its citizens are warrant the TSA to violate our 4th amendment rights.

    Not to mention allocate our tax dollars to the point where 60% of our taxes go to government contracts of war & department of defense. In addition to the troops, planes and ships being deployed, we hire mercenaries and private security companies for what? Allegedly 70 men? a Million Iraqi civilians died for 70 men?

  • Yith

    None… just like Fukushima. I WIN!!!!

  • Yith

    “The 911 commission report is a 592 page paperback book – the NIST report is roughly 28 chapters online plus a photo gallery. each chapter or pdf is lengthy or say the least. its not an easy read. No i don’t have a hard copy . Its taken quite some time. I’m not even done yet.”

    So you haven’t actually read the NIST report, which is at least 10,000 pages.

    “You should take a look at the ground truth a book written by John Farmer Senior advisory of the 9/11 commission report. Or Pentagate. I’m attempting to set up a Formal Debate at Georgia Tech.”

    What is it with Georgia Tech? Is it a den of troofers or something — this is the second mention of Georgia Tech on this Rogan topic.

    Formal or informal debate is the WORST way to get at the truth… as anyone who has been wrongly convicted will tell you: a not especially charismatic or engaging defense attorney who speaks the truth is no match for a silver-tongued, comely prosecutor with no case. The internet age is making us all too aware of this. See, for example, Phil Plait’s comments about his debate with Rogan on the Moon Landing Hoax Conspiracy. Quoting from http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2007/02/26/joe-rogan-me-and-penn-and-the-moon-hoax-take-iii/ :

    “I do have an advantage over Joe — I’m right, after all! — but he has a lot more rhetorical practice, of course. He’s a standup comic, and an actor, and a TV show host and is a lot more aggressive than I am. On radio, that makes up pretty well for being wrong!”

    If you want to come as close to “The Truth” as is possible in this world, try the peer-review process. It’s slow — people take their time — but it works.

  • American_girl

    No – I’ve not read the entire thing, I’m STILL reading it. Like i said there are chapters online. The NIST report was separate from the 911 commission report. there was no mention of WTC 7 in the 911 commission report. Not because I’ve read it but because they SAID it. They didn’t focus on it because they didn’t think it was relevant. But too many people had questions. they would not allow the testimony of the firefighters and police officers, 1st responders and volunteers or anyone who mentioned explosions in the report. but i’m sure you’ve read it– right?

    I don’t know about the moon landing. Its not changing my life either way. 9/11 has. and 9/11 continues to. No one is getting blown to pieces over the moon landing. So you bringing it up is really just to fill space in your post. I know the Apollo Misson proved several things. they still don’t know why the moon exist and the surface is dense and the body of the interior is a network of hollow caves they theorize. At least according to the seismic data.

    Since things don’t seem to be obvious to you, GA tech has a rather large and respected architecture & engineering student body. The Dean of Architecture has been asked to review this data in a formal debate. I’m pretty sure when a theory is up for discussion the standard procedure is to put it out before peers and professionals for review and scrutiny. See unlike the folks who support the official story– they are actually awaiting someone to debate the science who is actually an architect or engineer or building welding inspector. the only people who seem to debate them are journalist.

    Also – no is is watching or listening to your TV show. ..just sayin. and with that. I’m off to work.

    nice talkin with you.

  • Sometimesfree

    you can also look up NIST-NCSTAR 1A (WTC 7 summary report) on http://wtc.nist.gov/ – its a shitty read but you can do it champ.

  • Tuna Ghost

    Hey remember when I provided you with a detailed structural account of WTC 7’s collapse? Complete with pictures and diagrams and easy-to-understand physics? And you never replied? Why was that?

    And remember when I showed you that the editor of the Chemistry journal that published the “Nano-Thermite” article resigned because everyone knew it was a bullshit article that was inconclusive and had little to do with chemistry? Do you remember that? How you never replied, never responded to the huge amount of evidence supporting the notion that debris and fire were the primary cause of WTC’s collapse? Remember?

  • Tuna Ghost

    All of these claims have been debunked, guy. Long ago. Remember the last time you were singing this song? I told you there were several easy to understand explanations, that I could show you them if you wanted to see them? And you said yeah and I showed them to you? Remember the diagrams, the charts, the actual physics? Remember how you left the conversation and never returned?

  • Tuna Ghost

    Yeah, we don’t take you seriously because we’re either government agents or are incapable of believing the US gov’t doesn’t have our best interests at heart. Not because your claims have been debunked repeatedly, or because you sound like an idiot.

    Obviously.

  • Tuna Ghost

    Building 7. Has. Been. Explained. I’ve personally shown you the evidence. How long are you going to keep spouting half-truths and all-out lies?

  • Tuna Ghost

    Anyone who sees Building 7 collapse has all the information they need to question the official story.

    This is how millions of idiots suddenly feel qualified to toss out mountains of evidence in favor of flimsy conspiracy theories.

  • http://twitter.com/audiotruther Audio Truther

    the whole shit is bloody corrupt time to throw them all out , party over Lucifer, Yahweh is here on Earth , wake up ppl..the church is corrupt they don’t want us to realize we are God in the flesh , we were made in his image !!

    http://fightthe.podomatic.com/entry/2011-02-08T22_20_10-08_00

← Older Comments