DISCUSS (64)

Britain’s Assault On Squatters

Posted by JacobSloan on July 6, 2011

squatter-rights-5There are hundreds of thousands of empty properties in the UK – 650,000 in England alone. We should be seizing empty properties and giving them to people who need them, not locking up people for wanting a place to live.

People are broke and evicted. Meanwhile, countless homes sit unused and empty, or abandoned…some people take matters into their own hands and live as squatters. But now the outraged authorities are fighting back against the squatter scourge, the UK’s New Left Project writes:

The traditional view that the Tories are the party of the landed classes was built on solid bedrock. The last time they were in power they orchestrated the largest land-grab in living memory – the ‘right to buy’ – through which council housing passed to property magnates and buy-to-let landlords. This time around, spurred on by misleading articles in the right-wing media, they’ve announced plans to make squatting illegal and to allow landlords to forcibly evict people – whether squatters or tenant – backed up by the iron fist of the law. It is a calculated effort to empower those who own more property than they can ever use at the expense of those who have nothing.

Barry Wilton of SQUASH, a campaign group fighting the proposals, believes that the government is trying to pre-empt a wave of squatting brought about by spending cuts and rising unemployment. “They [the government] know that the financial crisis will lead to thousands of ordinary people being evicted for rent arrears or for getting behind with their mortgage,” he says. “With hundreds of thousands of empty properties gathering dust, it’s obvious that many of those people will turn to squatting as a legitimate reaction to a crisis they didn’t cause.”

Given the range of powers available to owner-occupiers and non-residential occupiers, it makes no sense for even the most desperate of squatters to move into a house which is clearly lived in. Instead, squatters are more likely to move into abandoned buildings owned by commercial or absentee landlords. Unlike owner-occupiers, owners of commercial properties can’t force their way back in because Section 6 of the Criminal Law Act 1977 makes it an offense for non-residents to use violence to enter a property where someone inside is opposed to their entry.

This law was brought in to give tenants protection from landlords, a fact of which the government is well aware. Crispin Blunt, the Prisons Minister, explained that although Section 6 “was designed to stop unscrupulous landlords from using violence to evict legitimate tenants,” he and his colleagues were considering ways to give “give non-residential property owners the same rights as displaced residential occupiers to break back into their property.” Instead of bringing both parties before a judge, which gives tenants a chance to prove they’ve the right to be there, often-complex housing issues would be dealt with on the doorstep, further inflaming an already heated situation.

Wilton argues that removing these protections will prove impractical. “You can imagine the situation,” he says. “The police turn up at the door and are told that the occupier is a squatter and asked to get them out. They’re expected, with no training, to decide who is right and who is wrong, and to act accordingly.” It’s a recipe for disaster, which may explain why the Police Federation and the Metropolitan Police opposed similar plans in the early 1990s.

It is difficult not to view these proposals as ideologically driven. This is, after all, a government which is relying on stories it knows are bogus to force through changes it accepts will only hurt vulnerable people. There are hundreds of thousands of empty properties in the UK – 650,000 in England alone, according to the Empty Homes Association. Is it really so bad if people put them to more productive use than their owners, especially if they’d otherwise require housing benefit or council housing?

“Ultimately,” says Wilton, “squatters are just stepping in to fill the gap brought about by a failure of both Tory and Labour governments to get to grips with the housing crisis. We should be seizing empty properties and giving them to people who need them, not locking up people for wanting a place to live.” That may be anathema to a party of inherited wealth and property, but it may well be the only equitable solution to this crisis which, we should remember, was caused by the very people that these new laws have been designed protect.

Related Posts with Thumbnails
  • Anonymous

    “Perhaps the part of the answer is a moratorium on foreclosure evictions.”
    Now you’re talkin…

  • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

    Speaking for ex-squatters…its less an act of malice or theft and more an act of desperation. Missions and shelters are dominated by halfway house rejects and thugs…a clean quiet place with a dash of privacy is a blessing beyond compare. Not sleeping with one hand on a knife is an underrated pleasure. 

    It may be illegal…but under the circumstances it happens in…it is far from immoral or unethical. What is unethical is a system that allows cost of housing to multiply exponentially based on speculation…forcing people into wage slavery to maintain even rudimentary housing…or ultimately making housing an impossible goal. When we consider just the economic harm, not just the human harm, that such a system brings into being…it would make sense for law and government to intervene and force a resolution that prevents the upward spiral of prices…not just to alleviate consumer suffering…but to free up almost staggering sums of money that could be returned to the economy in goods and services other than housing.

    I’m not unsympathetic to all landowners and renters…many mean well and just want to find good tenants at a reasonable price…but the price is pegged to area averages…so even a good landlord can easily find themselves in a market where the prices they charge reflect an overall failure. Squatters happen when alternatives do not exist…or are so horrible that anyone would choose a break in over the other choices. If you don’t address the underlying issues…the problem cannot be solved. Once again…the Tories find the ’solution’ that resembles slapping make up on a sucking chest wound. Might look less scary…but you’re still dying.

  • http://voxmagi-necessarywords.blogspot.com/ VoxMagi

    Speaking for ex-squatters…its less an act of malice or theft and more an act of desperation. Missions and shelters are dominated by halfway house rejects and thugs…a clean quiet place with a dash of privacy is a blessing beyond compare. Not sleeping with one hand on a knife is an underrated pleasure. 

    It may be illegal…but under the circumstances it happens in…it is far from immoral or unethical. What is unethical is a system that allows cost of housing to multiply exponentially based on speculation…forcing people into wage slavery to maintain even rudimentary housing…or ultimately making housing an impossible goal. When we consider just the economic harm, not just the human harm, that such a system brings into being…it would make sense for law and government to intervene and force a resolution that prevents the upward spiral of prices…not just to alleviate consumer suffering…but to free up almost staggering sums of money that could be returned to the economy in goods and services other than housing.

    I’m not unsympathetic to all landowners and renters…many mean well and just want to find good tenants at a reasonable price…but the price is pegged to area averages…so even a good landlord can easily find themselves in a market where the prices they charge reflect an overall failure. Squatters happen when alternatives do not exist…or are so horrible that anyone would choose a break in over the other choices. If you don’t address the underlying issues…the problem cannot be solved. Once again…the Tories find the ’solution’ that resembles slapping make up on a sucking chest wound. Might look less scary…but you’re still dying.

  • Anonymous

    Corporate Avenger is fantastic. I just listened for the first time and these guys are the shit. 

  • Anonymous

    Excellent -Vox.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks, that’s nice to know…

  • Anonymous

    Thanks, that’s nice to know…

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for your support! 

  • Anonymous

    Newsflash. People making minimum wage can’t afford a house. They’d be laughed out of the bank. People making twice minimum wage, even, can’t get approved (unless they’re part of the millions of people who were unwittingly part of the widespread bank fraud that caused the housing crisis in the first place). The banks do things like foreclose on homes that don’t even have mortgages on them. But the machine just cranks along, and often the people who’ve been wrongfully evicted can’t afford the legal fees they have to pay to get their house back. Those people have families. They often lose their job when their company finds out they’ve been foreclosed on, or when they are having trouble getting to work because they have no alarm clock, no clea clothes, and no way to do things like bathe before coming in. They’re just supposed to live on the street with their kids?  It’s not as black and white as you seem to think.

  • Anonymous

    Well said

  • Anonymous

    google the phrase “captive audience” and you’ll have your answer to the question in your first sentence. We have no choice but to pursue the things that are necessary for survival so the providers of those things have no incentive to keep their prices low. If they were charging 600 times more than they are now, we’d still have to buy from them.

  • Hadrian999

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/07/06/19-charged-in-gang-rapes-of-11-year-old-texas-girl/

    this is what people are, you can try hope i’ll take take the locks

  • Hadrian999

    http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/07/06/19-charged-in-gang-rapes-of-11-year-old-texas-girl/

    this is what people are, you can try hope i’ll take take the locks

  • Mr Willow

    The reality?

    The reality is that more money is spent on bombs than education, more attention is given to a congressman’s penis than the fact that people are dying needlessly from a lack of food, shelter, clean water, and medical care. The reality is that two or three hundred people are exorbitantly wealthy and the remainder are only becoming more destitute.

    The reality is that there are more people who would choose to love people over money in a second if they were only reminded that people invented currency. And that we can just as easily do away with it. 

    We invented all of this. And there are fewer people who would like to continue this delusion than not.