Mr. X’s Speech From ‘JFK’ (Video)

That’s essentially what Jackie Onassis claims in tapes to be released containing her statements regarding the Assassination.

“I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil
interests in 1914. I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National
CityBank boys to collect revenues in. I helped in the raping of half a
dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street. The record
of racketeering is long. I helped purify Nicaragua for the
international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-12. I brought light to the
Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916. I helped make
Honduras “right” for American fruit companies in 1903. In China in 1927
I helped see to it that Standard Oil went its way unmolested…. Looking back on it,
I felt I might have given Al Capone a few hints. The best he could do was
to operate his racket in three city districts. We Marines operated on
three continents.” Major. Gen. Smedley D. Butler (1935)

Butler was a man with courage to make that speech. Marines today could learn a lot from him. War is a racket.

Note that Jim Garrison was a mobbed up little tyrant, trumping up charges, paying off perjurers, threatening people who wouldn’t change their story, mocking evidence and otherwise using the Kennedy Assassination as a means to gain the spotlight and distract from his corruption.  He initially claimed that the snuff was a homosexual thrill killing, and his prosecution of Clay Shaw and his persecution of David Ferrie were deeply homophobic red herrings.  This film makes him out to be a hero, when he was in fact a fiend.

That being said, Mr. X’s speech is valuable, and while it is impossible to say what happened in Dallas that day, the two most likely scenarios are that Oswald acted alone or that an LBJ led plot killed Kennedy.  The problem with the Oswald scenario is that we now have at least one important plotter– E. Howard Hunt–who claimed right before his death that LBJ headed up a plot that he was asked to be a part of.  The problem with this scenario is that it doesn’t explain away how Oswald–who was a loser, and was unlikely to be a part of such a plot–ended up firing shots at Kennedy that day, as eyewitness and other evidence suggests.  In the end, it is a black hole of history, where even the likelihood of scenarios becomes nigh upon impossible to ascertain.

What this means is that we do not know if there was a coup in this country in 1963; the best answer we can give is “maybe.”  That is pretty shocking when you think about it, and it tends to dismiss the arguments of anybody–Left, Right or otherwise–who speak with great certainty about history or its first order derivative, politics.   

and the implication is…if a cabal was able to pull off the assassination of a President to further the MIC, then is it not likely that other major events that precipitated war were also manipulations? The posting of this clip is timely, to say the least. Unfortunately, I doubt we will ever *know* for sure….but as time marches on many of us know in out hearts and see it confirmed in the course of history. The only question that remains is whether or not we can regain control of the ship of humanity before these psychopaths take us off the edge. Forget the war on terror, the information war is the one you need to be fighting

JFK is a compelling work of fiction. Unbound by the shackles of accuracy, it is free to explore themes from which interesting posits about different subjects (truth, human nature, government) can be expressed. Shakespeare wrapped such works around narratives somewhat rooted in reality and this is no different; to read Shakespearean literature as historical documentation would be folly; to let the films of Oliver Stone substitute good, hard research is equally foolish. Unfortunately, JFK has had a profound effect on public opinion regarding conclusions which should almost never be drawn from watching a Hollywood film. In that respect, the movie itself borders on propaganda.

JFK is a compelling work of fiction. Unbound by the shackles of accuracy, it is free to explore themes from which interesting posits about different subjects (truth, human nature, government) can be expressed. Shakespeare wrapped such works around narratives somewhat rooted in reality and this is no different; to read Shakespearean literature as historical documentation would be folly; to let the films of Oliver Stone substitute good, hard research is equally foolish. Unfortunately, JFK has had a profound effect on public opinion regarding conclusions which should almost never be drawn from watching a Hollywood film. In that respect, the movie itself borders on propaganda.

“to let the films of Oliver Stone substitute good, hard research is equally foolish” so what is the hard research you follow.

One name: E. Howard Hunt

I know most of you are already familiar with the man and what he said in the last few months of his life, but I still think it helps us get closer to “the truth” than anything out there, including the Warren Commission.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E_Howard_Hunt

Texas is the reason, that the president’s dead.

“You can start with Wikipedia.”

HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa!!!