Go Homedisinformation ®  
Welcome to Disinformation   |   July 06, 2003
     
item of the day
Abuse Your Illusions - the follow-up to Everything You Know Is Wrong & You Are Being Lied To is in the store and every bit as essential. The long-awaited Disinformation DVD is in too!
>>Go
personal of the day
U.S. Weighs Military Intervention in Liberia
>>Go
What The European Papers Say
>>Go
Violence Mars Nigerian Strikes
>>Go
Religion in the News: June 2003
>>Go
login
signup
email
chat
forum
store

activism
aliens
conspiracies
drugs
entertainment
environment
government
history
humanrights
media
mindcontrol
paranormal
people
philosophies
politics
science
sex
spirituality
technology

about
free newsletter
help


'just like independence day!'
by Davide Girardelli (davide_girardelli@yahoo.com) - June. 19, 2002
3) Design versus Chance. The characters represented in Independence Day act in a rational, problem-solving fashion: ideation of a strategy, elaboration, and implementation. Coordination and control must be assured before the heroes are able to defeat the aliens and the importance of chance is minimal compared with the ability to carry out rational action plans. The final battle against the aliens is marked by a discourse of a redeemed President Whitmore, a former Gulf War pilot, who symbolically dismisses his weak clothes of politician to wear the one of fighter--“I’m a combat pilot, Will. I belong to the air,” he says to a worried general. In this way, his figure eventually rises as the one of a charismatic action leader. The plan devised by the heroes is twofold. It first requires that a small ship, with Captain Steven Hiller and the computer-whiz David Lavinson on board, penetrates in the body of the mothership to upload a cyber virus and to neutralize the invisible shields around the alien ships on the Earth. Once the protection shields are down, a worldwide attack, promoted and led by the Americans, will destroy the alien invaders. Minimal inventions help to maintain the dramatic tension, since nobody doubts that the heroes will obtain their victory: Hiller and Levinson’s ship is discovered in the last moment; the first global attack fails, and only the decision of president Whitmore--“Let’s try another shot”--brings back hope amongst the troops. The cinematographic montage in these last scenes is functional in manifesting the complexity of the perfect mechanism implemented by the heroes: the camera continuously shifts back and forth from actions inside the mothership and the activities around the Americans headquarters, the British troops in the Middle East, the Chinese, and the Russians.

Fight Club instead emphasizes chance and chaos. Since the plot is narrated in first-person, the audience shares the surprises encountered by Jack, his sense of confusion, and his enlightenments. Jack is not aware of the details of “Project Mayhem,” which his double personality Tyler is hatching. From an organizational perspective, Tyler also exemplifies the leadership style of postmodern leaders (Berquist 1993; Wheatly 1999). Like in a “chaos game” (Wheatly 1999) where “complex structures emerge over time from simple elements and rules and autonomous interaction” (p. 127), the groups of fight clubs share a simple set of rules determined by Tyler [2] and generate around the United States independently, like self-organized teams. Only Tyler understands the big picture behind the fight clubs, but on the other side Tyler himself is also subject to the rules that he has established: in Fight Club, leaders hold neither a higher rank nor an untouchable control position. For instance, when Jack goes to the police to denounce “Project Mayhem,” three policemen, secretly members of a fight club, confront him. They recognize him as their spiritual leader (“Sir, you are a hero. We really admire you”), since at their eyes Jack and his second personality Tyler are the same person. Nevertheless, they want to subject him to the procedure of castration that everyone who mentions the existence “Project Mayhem” must undergo.

4. Genital/Phallic versus Polymorphous/Androgynous. Scholars have singled out in the subtext of Independence Day clear phallic metaphors (Rogin 1998) and imagery of vagina dentata (Hobby 1996). The list of examples is extensive. The crew of Hiller and David penetrate to mothership, “which opens up her giant V-shaped orifice to invite their tiny projectile inside” (Rogin 1998, p. 57). As their clearly state, their mission is to “plant a virus into the mothership.” During the final battle, one of the pilots, who has been victim of a supposed sexual abuse by the aliens, takes his revenge flying inside the enemy space ship, shouting: “All right you alien assholes! In the words of my generation, up yours!” (Rogin 1998, p. 69). Hobby (1996) also observes that

the aliens' mother ship gives birth to smaller ships that resemble huge vagina dentata hovering above all of the world's major cities. Washington D.C.'s huge phallic structures, shot from an extremely low angle, appear erect and ready to rape the huge vaginal spacecraft. However, . . . the viewer sees the daughters of the mother ship destroy these phallic monuments. (p. 52; see figure 1)

This strongly metaphoric subtext has the precise function of reinforcing male power on women. According to Rogin (1998), “women are . . . restored to supporting roles in this supposedly politically correct film. The three career professionals [the wife of the president, Hiller’s partner, and David’s former wife] with whom the film begins are re-subordinated to their husband by its end” (p. 44). Right before dying, the energetic and politically involved first-lady confides to her husband her remorse for not having surrendered to his desire to return home immediately from her business trip, since he was worried for her safety (Rogin 1998). In regards to the relationship between Hiller and his partner, a former stripper, the movie suggests that this young black man better marry his girlfriend, . . . thereby making an honest woman of the mother of his son, or else - civilization as we know it will come to an end. So what if he already lives with her in suburban bliss, and is an active father? Without the sanction of that piece of paper, a proper church (or in this case chapel) wedding, and the witness of no less a Big Daddy than the President of the United States, actions and relationships mean nothing. (Dowell 1996, par. 5)

The most interesting relationship is the one between David Levinson and his ex-wife, the ambitious presidential press secretary, who sacrificed family for career. At the beginning of the movie she refuses to listen to his ex-husband David Levinson, causing the death of millions of people. Later, David’s ex-wife re-pledges herself to her man, and at the end of the movie David can show his regained virility smoking a cigar, while his wife act as a “conformist cheerleader who jump into the arms of [her] big, strong [man] who saved the earth” (Hobby 1996, p. 53). In short, war is the right occasion for men to display their virile qualities. In this phallic celebration, which constitutes a strong subtext in Independence Day, it is also possible to observe that none of the brave pilots in the final fight is a woman (Hobby 1996, p. 53), and that all gay characters die during the catastrophe of day one (Rogin 1998, p. 66). Hobby (1996) summarizes the morale of the movie in one sentence: “Stand by your man and shut up” (p. 53).

 
 

<< LAST ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... NEXT >>



  • I remember when...
  • oh really...?


  • © 1997-2002 The Disinformation Company Ltd. All rights reserved.