Although Jackins later parted ways with Church of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard, he retained many concepts gleaned during his tenure with the powerful religious group.The use of an "auditor" to
closely listen to the ruminations of others is eerily similar to co-counseling and Hubbard's belief in "unlocking the power of the human
mind" is also consistent with RC's belief that purging negative
emotions will unleash long-dormant intellectual powers.
"Many RC
assumptions, such as the central importance of the discharge process,
are identical to the dianetic ideas developed many years earlier by
Hubbard, despite the repeated insistence of Jackins and his followers on the distinctiveness of their ideas," Dr. Tourish notes.
Although none dare call them a cult, this totalistic ideology does seem to exhibit various characteristics endemic to coercive sects.
Their authoritarianism, dogmatism, and sense of mission exhibit a marked "chosen people" mentality and the "discharge" process closely resembles the "cult of confession" practiced by Jim Jones and the People's Temple or the "attack therapy" techniques utilized at Synanon. The belief that only the co-counseling community is in possession of invaluable insights
unfathomable to the "wide world" serves as yet another effective method to instill obedience to RC theory and further insulate its members from
alternative ideas.
"What you've got is an entire political movement built of 'yes men'" declares O'Hartigan. Despite its unsavory origins, questionable history, and dubious methods, RC is on the march.
Discerning activists should aware of this dynamic mass movement, which seeks to appropriate the lexicon of opposition politics, in order to propagate a collective agenda of group control, statism, and neo-Freudian tomfoolery.
Endnotes:
[1] "Sex, Lies, & Co-Counseling." Activist Men's
Journal, August 1993.
[2] "Reaching for
Influence." Present Time, January 1998.
[3] "Group Influence and the Psychology of Cultism Within Re-evaluation Counseling: A Critique." Cultic Studies Journal, Vol. 13, No 2, 1996.
[4] "Attack Theory: Reevaluating RC." The Polemicist, April 1992.