<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Disinformation &#187; Evolutionary Psychology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disinfo.com/tag/evolutionary-psychology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disinfo.com</link>
	<description>alternative views, news &#38; information—online, video and print</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Building An Empathetic Global Civilization</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/02/building-an-empathetic-global-civilization/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/02/building-an-empathetic-global-civilization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JacobSloan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empathy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=47364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In this <a href="http://comment.rsablogs.org.uk/videos/">RSA Animate</a>, Jeremy Rifkin examines our innate capacity for empathy, one of the defining traits of the human race (though we share it with a few other species). Rifkin argues that throughout history humans have progressively expanded their "spheres of empathy", and that our survival as a species depends on expanding empathy further, rather than retreating into tribalism. Will our empathic impulses become more globalized, along with everything else? Or do the conditions of today breed a narrow self-interest which could destroy us?

<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="390" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l7AWnfFRc7g?fs=1&#38;hl=en_US&#38;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l7AWnfFRc7g?fs=1&#38;hl=en_US&#38;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this <a href="http://comment.rsablogs.org.uk/videos/">RSA Animate</a>, Jeremy Rifkin examines our innate capacity for empathy, one of the defining traits of the human race (though we share it with a few other species). Rifkin argues that throughout history humans have progressively expanded their &#8220;spheres of empathy&#8221;, and that our survival as a species depends on expanding empathy further, rather than retreating into tribalism. Will our empathic impulses become more globalized, along with everything else? Or do the conditions of today breed a narrow self-interest which could destroy us?</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="640" height="390" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l7AWnfFRc7g?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="640" height="390" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l7AWnfFRc7g?fs=1&amp;hl=en_US&amp;rel=0" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/02/building-an-empathetic-global-civilization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>19</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I Love My Children — I Hate My Life</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/07/i-love-my-children-%e2%80%94-i-hate-my-life/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/07/i-love-my-children-%e2%80%94-i-hate-my-life/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phunkychic666</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mental Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=32584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_32586" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 193px"><a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/67024/"><img class="size-full wp-image-32586  " style="margin-left: 25px;" title="Kids" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Kids.jpg" alt="Photo: Jessica Todd Harper" width="183" height="291" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: Jessica Todd Harper</p></div>
<p>Jennifer Senior writes in <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/67024">New York</a> magazine:</p>
<blockquote><p>There was a day a few weeks ago when I found my 2½-year-old son sitting on our building doorstep, waiting for me to come home. He spotted me as I was rounding the corner, and the scene that followed was one of inexpressible loveliness, right out of the movie I’d played to myself before actually having a child, with him popping out of his babysitter’s arms and barreling down the street to greet me.</p>
<p>This happy moment, though, was about to be cut short, and in retrospect felt more like a tranquil lull in a slasher film. When I opened our apartment door, I discovered that my son had broken part of the wooden parking garage I’d spent about an hour assembling that morning.</p>
<p>This wouldn’t have been a problem per se, except that as I attempted to fix it, he grew impatient and&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_32586" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 193px"><a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/67024/"><img class="size-full wp-image-32586  " style="margin-left: 25px;" title="Kids" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/Kids.jpg" alt="Photo: Jessica Todd Harper" width="183" height="291" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: Jessica Todd Harper</p></div>
<p>Jennifer Senior writes in <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/67024">New York</a> magazine:</p>
<blockquote><p>There was a day a few weeks ago when I found my 2½-year-old son sitting on our building doorstep, waiting for me to come home. He spotted me as I was rounding the corner, and the scene that followed was one of inexpressible loveliness, right out of the movie I’d played to myself before actually having a child, with him popping out of his babysitter’s arms and barreling down the street to greet me.</p>
<p>This happy moment, though, was about to be cut short, and in retrospect felt more like a tranquil lull in a slasher film. When I opened our apartment door, I discovered that my son had broken part of the wooden parking garage I’d spent about an hour assembling that morning.</p>
<p>This wouldn’t have been a problem per se, except that as I attempted to fix it, he grew impatient and began throwing its various parts at the walls, with one plank very narrowly missing my eye. I recited the rules of the house (no throwing, no hitting). He picked up another large wooden plank. I ducked. He reached for the screwdriver. The scene ended with a time-out in his crib.</p>
<p>As I shuffled back to the living room, I thought of something a friend once said about the Children’s Museum of Manhattan — “a nice place, but what it really needs is a bar” — and rued how, at that moment, the same thing could be said of my apartment. Two hundred and 40 seconds earlier, I’d been in a state of pair-bonded bliss; now I was guided by nerves, trawling the cabinets for alcohol.</p>
<p>My emotional life looks a lot like this these days. I suspect it does for many parents — a high-amplitude, high-frequency sine curve along which we get the privilege of doing hourly surfs. Yet it’s something most of us choose. Indeed, it’s something most of us would say we’d be miserable without.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read More in <a href="http://nymag.com/news/features/67024">New York</a> magazine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/07/i-love-my-children-%e2%80%94-i-hate-my-life/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wrong By Design: Why Our Brains Are Fooled by Illusions (Photos)</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/06/wrong-by-design-why-our-brains-are-fooled-by-illusions-photos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/06/wrong-by-design-why-our-brains-are-fooled-by-illusions-photos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 02:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phunkychic666</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illusions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=31636</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://discovermagazine.com/photos/09-wrong-by-design-why-our-brain-are-fooled-by-illusions/">Discover Magazine</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>Neuroscientists usually explain color illusions in mechanistic terms. Beau Lotto says that misses the point: We misperceive colors and shapes because our visual sense has been molded by evolutionary history.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_31638" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 517px"><a href="http://discovermagazine.com/photos/09-wrong-by-design-why-our-brain-are-fooled-by-illusions/"><img class="size-full wp-image-31638 " style="margin-left: 80px; margin-right: 150px;" title="Illusions" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Illusions.jpg" alt="In the above image, all the blue dots are the same brightness." width="507" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">In the above image, all the blue dots are the same brightness.</p></div>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/photos/09-wrong-by-design-why-our-brain-are-fooled-by-illusions/">Discover  Magazine</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://discovermagazine.com/photos/09-wrong-by-design-why-our-brain-are-fooled-by-illusions/">Discover Magazine</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>Neuroscientists usually explain color illusions in mechanistic terms. Beau Lotto says that misses the point: We misperceive colors and shapes because our visual sense has been molded by evolutionary history.</p></blockquote>
<div id="attachment_31638" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 517px"><a href="http://discovermagazine.com/photos/09-wrong-by-design-why-our-brain-are-fooled-by-illusions/"><img class="size-full wp-image-31638 " style="margin-left: 80px; margin-right: 150px;" title="Illusions" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/Illusions.jpg" alt="In the above image, all the blue dots are the same brightness." width="507" height="360" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">In the above image, all the blue dots are the same brightness.</p></div>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://discovermagazine.com/photos/09-wrong-by-design-why-our-brain-are-fooled-by-illusions/">Discover  Magazine</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/06/wrong-by-design-why-our-brains-are-fooled-by-illusions-photos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lying Children Will Grow Up To Be Successful Citizens</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/05/lying-children-will-grow-up-to-be-successful-citizens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/05/lying-children-will-grow-up-to-be-successful-citizens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 05:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ralph</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bizarre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Propaganda]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simpsons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=30164</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Did we all already know this &#8230; or is it a great leap forward in our understanding? Richard Alleyne writes in the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7730522/Lying-children-will-grow-up-to-be-successful-citizens.html">Telegraph</a>:<br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-30165" style="margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-top: 15px;" title="Bart Simpson Loves You" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/BartAss.jpg" alt="Bart Simpson Loves You" width="155" height="180" /></p>
<blockquote><p>Researchers have found that the ability to tell fibs at the age of two is a sign of a fast developing brain and means they are more likely to have successful lives.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>They found that the more plausible the lie, the more quick witted they will be in later years and the better their abiliy to think on their feet.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>It also means that they have developed &#8220;executive function&#8221; — the ability to invent a convincing lie by keeping the truth at the back of their mind.</p>
<p>“Parents should not be alarmed if their child tells a fib,” said Dr Kang Lee, director of the Institute of Child Study at Toronto Universit who carried out the research.</p>
<p>“Almost all children lie. Those who have better cognitive development lie better because they can&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did we all already know this &#8230; or is it a great leap forward in our understanding? Richard Alleyne writes in the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7730522/Lying-children-will-grow-up-to-be-successful-citizens.html">Telegraph</a>:<br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-30165" style="margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-top: 15px;" title="Bart Simpson Loves You" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/BartAss.jpg" alt="Bart Simpson Loves You" width="155" height="180" /></p>
<blockquote><p>Researchers have found that the ability to tell fibs at the age of two is a sign of a fast developing brain and means they are more likely to have successful lives.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>They found that the more plausible the lie, the more quick witted they will be in later years and the better their abiliy to think on their feet.</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>It also means that they have developed &#8220;executive function&#8221; — the ability to invent a convincing lie by keeping the truth at the back of their mind.</p>
<p>“Parents should not be alarmed if their child tells a fib,” said Dr Kang Lee, director of the Institute of Child Study at Toronto Universit who carried out the research.</p>
<p>“Almost all children lie. Those who have better cognitive development lie better because they can cover up their tracks. They may make bankers in later life.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7730522/Lying-children-will-grow-up-to-be-successful-citizens.html">Telegraph</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/05/lying-children-will-grow-up-to-be-successful-citizens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Female Toads Inflate to Avoid Sex</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/01/female-toads-inflate-to-avoid-sex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/01/female-toads-inflate-to-avoid-sex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 21:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Sonny Liston</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Biology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=18824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8443771.stm"><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ToadSex.jpg" alt="ToadSex" title="ToadSex" class="alignright size-full wp-image-18825" width="265" height="182" />BBC News</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>When it comes to choosing a mate, female toads may have more control than previously thought, say scientists. A report in the Royal Society&#8217;s Biology Letters journal describes how a female cane toad inflates its body to prevent an amorous male from mating with it.</p>
<p>This makes it difficult for the male toad to &#8220;hold on&#8221;.</p>
<p>Male toads often wrestle with each other in an effort to grasp a mate. By inflating, a female can influence the outcome of such a competition.</p>
<p>It is assumed that frogs and toads evolved the ability to inflate their bodies with air as a defence against predators. The team of scientists, from Australia and the Netherlands, described in their report how this deters predators &#8220;by increasing the apparent size of the [frog or toad] and by rendering it too large to ingest&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read More on <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8443771.stm">BBC News</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8443771.stm"><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ToadSex.jpg" alt="ToadSex" title="ToadSex" class="alignright size-full wp-image-18825" width="265" height="182" />BBC News</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>When it comes to choosing a mate, female toads may have more control than previously thought, say scientists. A report in the Royal Society&#8217;s Biology Letters journal describes how a female cane toad inflates its body to prevent an amorous male from mating with it.</p>
<p>This makes it difficult for the male toad to &#8220;hold on&#8221;.</p>
<p>Male toads often wrestle with each other in an effort to grasp a mate. By inflating, a female can influence the outcome of such a competition.</p>
<p>It is assumed that frogs and toads evolved the ability to inflate their bodies with air as a defence against predators. The team of scientists, from Australia and the Netherlands, described in their report how this deters predators &#8220;by increasing the apparent size of the [frog or toad] and by rendering it too large to ingest&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read More on <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8443771.stm">BBC News</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/01/female-toads-inflate-to-avoid-sex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Scientists Say Dolphins Should Be Considered &#8216;Persons&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/01/scientists-say-dolphins-should-be-considered-persons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/01/scientists-say-dolphins-should-be-considered-persons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 17:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JacobSloan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Animal Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dolphins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Neuroscience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=18524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/11/26/2711N_DOLPHIN_narrowweb__300x368,2.jpg" title="Dolphin Dance" class="alignright" height="282" width="231" />Scientists say that dolphins as a species are significantly smarter than chimpanzees, so smart that they should be classified as "non-human persons" — making it deeply unethical to keep them in amusement parks or inadvertently kill them in fishing operations.

Until recently, dolphins were placed third among animals in intelligence (behind humans and chimps). However, new behavioral studies suggests that dolphins are smarter than previously believed. How smart? From the U.K.'s <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/article6973994.ece">Times</a>:
<blockquote>Dolphins have distinct personalities, a strong sense of self and can think about the future.

Dolphins can solve difficult problems, and those in the wild cooperate in ways that imply complex social structures and a high level of emotional sophistication. It has also become clear that they are “cultural” animals.

Bottlenose dolphins [can] recognize themselves in a mirror and use it to inspect various parts of their bodies, an ability that had been thought limited to humans and great apes.</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://www.theage.com.au/ffximage/2007/11/26/2711N_DOLPHIN_narrowweb__300x368,2.jpg" title="Dolphin Dance" class="alignright" height="282" width="231" />Scientists say that dolphins as a species are significantly smarter than chimpanzees, so smart that they should be classified as &#8220;non-human persons&#8221; — making it deeply unethical to keep them in amusement parks or inadvertently kill them in fishing operations.</p>
<p>Until recently, dolphins were placed third among animals in intelligence (behind humans and chimps). However, new behavioral studies suggests that dolphins are smarter than previously believed. How smart? From the U.K.&#8217;s <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/article6973994.ece">Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Dolphins have distinct personalities, a strong sense of self and can think about the future.</p>
<p>Dolphins can solve difficult problems, and those in the wild cooperate in ways that imply complex social structures and a high level of emotional sophistication. It has also become clear that they are “cultural” animals.</p>
<p>Bottlenose dolphins [can] recognize themselves in a mirror and use it to inspect various parts of their bodies, an ability that had been thought limited to humans and great apes.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read More in the <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/science/article6973994.ece">Times</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/01/scientists-say-dolphins-should-be-considered-persons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>47</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Six Adorable Cat Behaviors With Shockingly Evil Explanations</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/six-adorable-cat-behaviors-with-shockingly-evil-explanations/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/six-adorable-cat-behaviors-with-shockingly-evil-explanations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:03:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ralph</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=16807</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is why some people think that cats are snakes with fur. Perhaps your grandmother from the old country wasn't that crazy. Matthew Hayden writes on <a href="http://www.cracked.com/article/226_6-adorable-cat-behaviors-with-shockingly-evil-explanations">Cracked.com</a>:
<blockquote>There seem to be two kinds of people in the world: those who don't understand cats, and those who think cats are kind of douchebags.

Unfortunately for cat lovers, science has kind of come down on the side of that second group. Research has revealed that a lot of the quirky and even cute things your kitty does are actually signs that your cat is kind of a dick.

<strong><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CatOverlord.jpg" alt="CatOverlord" title="CatOverlord" class="alignright size-full wp-image-16808" height="227" width="313" />Rubbing Against You to Declare Ownership:</strong> By nature cats are hard to read. They're not like dogs, hopping around with joy when you walk in the door, or slinking away with shame when caught eating the garbage. No, cats have mastered an expression of almost disdainful indifference that they seem to wear regardless of their mood.

However, as any spinster will tell you, a cat's affection is obvious when its purring and rubbing its face and body against your leg. It's like the animal is giving you a little kitty hug the only way it knows how!

The problem with that, though, is when cats rub up against their owners, it has nothing to do with affection at all, but instead is kitty's way of claiming you as its property.</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why some people think that cats are snakes with fur. Perhaps your grandmother from the old country wasn&#8217;t that crazy. Matthew Hayden writes on <a href="http://www.cracked.com/article/226_6-adorable-cat-behaviors-with-shockingly-evil-explanations">Cracked.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>There seem to be two kinds of people in the world: those who don&#8217;t understand cats, and those who think cats are kind of douchebags.</p>
<p>Unfortunately for cat lovers, science has kind of come down on the side of that second group. Research has revealed that a lot of the quirky and even cute things your kitty does are actually signs that your cat is kind of a dick.</p>
<p><strong><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/CatOverlord.jpg" alt="CatOverlord" title="CatOverlord" class="alignright size-full wp-image-16808" height="227" width="313" />Rubbing Against You to Declare Ownership:</strong> By nature cats are hard to read. They&#8217;re not like dogs, hopping around with joy when you walk in the door, or slinking away with shame when caught eating the garbage. No, cats have mastered an expression of almost disdainful indifference that they seem to wear regardless of their mood.</p>
<p>However, as any spinster will tell you, a cat&#8217;s affection is obvious when its purring and rubbing its face and body against your leg. It&#8217;s like the animal is giving you a little kitty hug the only way it knows how!</p>
<p>The problem with that, though, is when cats rub up against their owners, it has nothing to do with affection at all, but instead is kitty&#8217;s way of claiming you as its property.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more on <a href="http://www.cracked.com/article/226_6-adorable-cat-behaviors-with-shockingly-evil-explanations">Cracked.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/12/six-adorable-cat-behaviors-with-shockingly-evil-explanations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Unromantic Truth About Why We Kiss — To Spread Germs</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/the-unromantic-truth-about-why-we-kiss-%e2%80%94-to-spread-germs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/the-unromantic-truth-about-why-we-kiss-%e2%80%94-to-spread-germs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 21:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ralph</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=13398</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6f/French_Kiss.JPG/800px-French_Kiss.JPG" title="Kiss" class="alignright" width="335" height="222" />Fiona Macrae writes in the <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1224249/The-unromantic-truth-kiss--spread-germs.html">Daily Mail</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is an international symbol of love and romance. But the kiss may have evolved for reasons that are far more practical — and less alluring. British scientists believe it developed to spread germs.</p>
<p>They say that the uniquely human habit allows a bug that is dangerous in pregnancy to be passed from man to woman to give her time to build up immunity. Cytomegalovirus, which lurks in saliva, normally causes no problems. But it can be extremely dangerous if caught while pregnant and can kill unborn babies or cause birth defects. These can include problems ranging from deafness to cerebral palsy.</p>
<p>Writing in the journal <em>Medical Hypotheses</em>, researcher Dr Colin Hendrie from the University of Leeds said: &#8216;Female inoculation with a specific male&#8217;s cytomegalovirus is most efficiently achieved through mouth-to-mouth contact and saliva exchange.</p></blockquote>
<p>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:French_Kiss.JPG">Wikimedia Commons</a></p>
<p>More in the <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1224249/The-unromantic-truth-kiss--spread-germs.html">Daily Mail</a></p>
&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6f/French_Kiss.JPG/800px-French_Kiss.JPG" title="Kiss" class="alignright" width="335" height="222" />Fiona Macrae writes in the <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1224249/The-unromantic-truth-kiss--spread-germs.html">Daily Mail</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>It is an international symbol of love and romance. But the kiss may have evolved for reasons that are far more practical — and less alluring. British scientists believe it developed to spread germs.</p>
<p>They say that the uniquely human habit allows a bug that is dangerous in pregnancy to be passed from man to woman to give her time to build up immunity. Cytomegalovirus, which lurks in saliva, normally causes no problems. But it can be extremely dangerous if caught while pregnant and can kill unborn babies or cause birth defects. These can include problems ranging from deafness to cerebral palsy.</p>
<p>Writing in the journal <em>Medical Hypotheses</em>, researcher Dr Colin Hendrie from the University of Leeds said: &#8216;Female inoculation with a specific male&#8217;s cytomegalovirus is most efficiently achieved through mouth-to-mouth contact and saliva exchange.</p></blockquote>
<p>Image via <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:French_Kiss.JPG">Wikimedia Commons</a></p>
<p>More in the <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1224249/The-unromantic-truth-kiss--spread-germs.html">Daily Mail</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/the-unromantic-truth-about-why-we-kiss-%e2%80%94-to-spread-germs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Depression&#8217;s Evolutionary Roots</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/09/depressions-evolutionary-roots/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/09/depressions-evolutionary-roots/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>klintron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consciousness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Depression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evolutionary Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Happiness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange Science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=10816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Paul W. Andrews and J. Anderson Thomson, Jr. write in <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=depressions-evolutionary">Scientific American</a> (via <a href="http://twitter.com/theoretick">Theoretick</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>Depression seems to pose an evolutionary paradox. Research in the US and other countries estimates that between 30 to 50 percent of people have met current psychiatric diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder sometime in their lives. But the brain plays crucial roles in promoting survival and reproduction, so the pressures of evolution should have left our brains resistant to such high rates of malfunction. Mental disorders should generally be rare — why isn’t depression? [...]</p>
<p>In an article recently published in Psychological Review, we argue that depression is in fact an adaptation, a state of mind which brings real costs, but also brings real benefits. [...]</p>
<p>So what could be so useful about depression? Depressed people often think intensely about their problems. These thoughts are called ruminations; they are persistent and depressed people have difficulty thinking about anything else.&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul W. Andrews and J. Anderson Thomson, Jr. write in <a href="http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=depressions-evolutionary">Scientific American</a> (via <a href="http://twitter.com/theoretick">Theoretick</a>):</p>
<blockquote><p>Depression seems to pose an evolutionary paradox. Research in the US and other countries estimates that between 30 to 50 percent of people have met current psychiatric diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder sometime in their lives. But the brain plays crucial roles in promoting survival and reproduction, so the pressures of evolution should have left our brains resistant to such high rates of malfunction. Mental disorders should generally be rare — why isn’t depression? [...]</p>
<p>In an article recently published in Psychological Review, we argue that depression is in fact an adaptation, a state of mind which brings real costs, but also brings real benefits. [...]</p>
<p>So what could be so useful about depression? Depressed people often think intensely about their problems. These thoughts are called ruminations; they are persistent and depressed people have difficulty thinking about anything else. Numerous studies have also shown that this thinking style is often highly analytical. They dwell on a complex problem, breaking it down into smaller components, which are considered one at a time.</p>
<p>This analytical style of thought, of course, can be very productive. Each component is not as difficult, so the problem becomes more tractable. Indeed, when you are faced with a difficult problem, such as a math problem, feeling depressed is often a useful response that may help you analyze and solve it. For instance, in some of our research, we have found evidence that people who get more depressed while they are working on complex problems in an intelligence test tend to score higher on the test. [...]</p>
<p>Depression is nature’s way of telling you that you’ve got complex social problems that the mind is intent on solving. Therapies should try to encourage depressive rumination rather than try to stop it, and they should focus on trying to help people solve the problems that trigger their bouts of depression. (There are several effective therapies that focus on just this.) It is also essential, in instances where there is resistance to discussing ruminations, that the therapist try to identify and dismantle those barriers.</p></blockquote>
<p>For those who think modernity or civilization or technology is the problem:</p>
<blockquote><p>Or, perhaps, depression might be like obesity — a problem that arises because modern conditions are so different from those in which we evolved. Homo sapiens did not evolve with cookies and soda at the fingertips. Yet this is not a satisfactory explanation either. The symptoms of depression have been found in every culture which has been carefully examined, including small-scale societies, such as the Ache of Paraguay and the !Kung of southern Africa — societies where people are thought to live in environments similar to those that prevailed in our evolutionary past.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/09/depressions-evolutionary-roots/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

