<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Disinformation &#187; Gay Marriage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disinfo.com/tag/gay-marriage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disinfo.com</link>
	<description>alternative views, news &#38; information—online, video and print</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>California Court Rules Gay-Marriage Ban Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2012/02/california-court-rules-gay-marriage-ban-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2012/02/california-court-rules-gay-marriage-ban-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ralph</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=68001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Prop8.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-68002" style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" title="Prop 8" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Prop8.jpg" alt="Prop 8" width="317" height="227" /></a>And now the Supremes will decide. Via <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/idUS318504303020120207">Reuters</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The U.S. 9th Circuit of Appeals in San Francisco Tuesday upheld a lower court decision, which had declared unconstitutional California’s controversial Proposition 8 banning same sex marriage.</p>
<p>The matter is now expected to travel to the U.S. Supreme Court. The ruling, made by judges Stephen Reinhardt, Michael Daly Hawkins and Randy Smith — appointed by Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush respectively — ruled on both the constitutionality of Prop 8 and whether the judge who struck down Prop 8 should have recused because he is gay. They heard oral arguments on the constitutionality question more than a year ago, and the recusal matter in December.</p>
<p>California voters agreed to Prop 8 — also known as the California Marriage Protection Act — in November 2008 by a 52 to 47 percent margin (approximately 13 million voters took part). That vote inserted language in&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Prop8.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-68002" style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" title="Prop 8" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/Prop8.jpg" alt="Prop 8" width="317" height="227" /></a>And now the Supremes will decide. Via <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/idUS318504303020120207">Reuters</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>The U.S. 9th Circuit of Appeals in San Francisco Tuesday upheld a lower court decision, which had declared unconstitutional California’s controversial Proposition 8 banning same sex marriage.</p>
<p>The matter is now expected to travel to the U.S. Supreme Court. The ruling, made by judges Stephen Reinhardt, Michael Daly Hawkins and Randy Smith — appointed by Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush respectively — ruled on both the constitutionality of Prop 8 and whether the judge who struck down Prop 8 should have recused because he is gay. They heard oral arguments on the constitutionality question more than a year ago, and the recusal matter in December.</p>
<p>California voters agreed to Prop 8 — also known as the California Marriage Protection Act — in November 2008 by a 52 to 47 percent margin (approximately 13 million voters took part). That vote inserted language in the state constitution expressly allowing marriage only between a man and a woman.</p></blockquote>
<p>More: <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/07/idUS318504303020120207">Reuters</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2012/02/california-court-rules-gay-marriage-ban-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York State Passes Gay Marriage Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/06/new-york-state-passes-gay-marriage-bill/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/06/new-york-state-passes-gay-marriage-bill/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 03:56:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>imkaan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Liberties]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=56178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<a href="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/NYMarriage.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-56179" style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 5px;" title="NY Marriage" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/NYMarriage.jpg" alt="NY Marriage" width="288" height="250" /></a>Reid J. Epstein writes in the <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/57749.html">Politico</a>:
<blockquote>Striking what advocates believe is a historic victory for gay rights, the New York state senate Friday approved same-sex marriage, bringing New York a promised governor’s signature away from being the sixth and largest state to allow gays and lesbians to marry.

The 33–29 vote is an enormous victory for first-year Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat who pledged during last fall’s campaign to push for gay marriage. It comes after an intense public and private lobbying campaign from a wide cast of politicians, celebrities and athletes, including New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former President Bill Clinton.

Cuomo, whose two daughters attended the vote in the senate gallery, is expected to sign the bill. The bill will become law 30 days after Cuomo signs it, and when it does, it will double the population of Americans for whom same-sex marriage is legal.</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/NYMarriage.jpg"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-56179" style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 5px;" title="NY Marriage" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/NYMarriage.jpg" alt="NY Marriage" width="288" height="250" /></a>Reid J. Epstein writes in the <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/57749.html">Politico</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Striking what advocates believe is a historic victory for gay rights, the New York state senate Friday approved same-sex marriage, bringing New York a promised governor’s signature away from being the sixth and largest state to allow gays and lesbians to marry.</p>
<p>The 33–29 vote is an enormous victory for first-year Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat who pledged during last fall’s campaign to push for gay marriage. It comes after an intense public and private lobbying campaign from a wide cast of politicians, celebrities and athletes, including New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg and former President Bill Clinton.</p>
<p>Cuomo, whose two daughters attended the vote in the senate gallery, is expected to sign the bill. The bill will become law 30 days after Cuomo signs it, and when it does, it will double the population of Americans for whom same-sex marriage is legal.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read more: <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0611/57749.html">Politico</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/06/new-york-state-passes-gay-marriage-bill/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>14</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Americans Now Favor Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/05/most-americans-now-favor-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/05/most-americans-now-favor-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 14:12:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>majestic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Society]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=54273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Polling organization <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/First-Time-Majority-Americans-Favor-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx">Gallup</a> reports:

<blockquote>For the first time in Gallup's tracking of the issue, a majority of Americans (53%) believe same-sex marriage should be recognized by the law as valid, with the same rights as traditional marriages. The increase since last year came exclusively among political independents and Democrats. Republicans' views did not change.

[caption id="attachment_54274" align="alignnone" width="568" caption="Source: Gallup"]<a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/First-Time-Majority-Americans-Favor-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx"><img src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/gay-poll.gif" alt="Source: Gallup" title="gay poll" width="568" height="324" class="size-full wp-image-54274" /></a>[/caption]

These results are based on Gallup's May 5-8 Values and Beliefs poll, which has tracked attitudes toward legalizing same-sex marriage each year since 2004...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polling organization <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/First-Time-Majority-Americans-Favor-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx">Gallup</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote><p>For the first time in Gallup&#8217;s tracking of the issue, a majority of Americans (53%) believe same-sex marriage should be recognized by the law as valid, with the same rights as traditional marriages. The increase since last year came exclusively among political independents and Democrats. Republicans&#8217; views did not change.</p>
<div id="attachment_54274" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 578px"><a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/First-Time-Majority-Americans-Favor-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx"><img src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/gay-poll.gif" alt="Source: Gallup" title="gay poll" width="568" height="324" class="size-full wp-image-54274" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Source: Gallup</p></div>
<p>These results are based on Gallup&#8217;s May 5-8 Values and Beliefs poll, which has tracked attitudes toward legalizing same-sex marriage each year since 2004, adding to Gallup&#8217;s initial polling on the topic in 1996 and 1999.</p>
<p>This year&#8217;s nine-percentage-point increase in support for same-sex marriage is the largest year-to-year shift yet measured over this time period. Two-thirds of Americans were opposed to legalized same-sex marriage in 1996, with 27% in favor. By 2004, support had risen to 42% and, despite some fluctuations from year to year, stayed at roughly that level through last year&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>[continues at <a href="http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/First-Time-Majority-Americans-Favor-Legal-Gay-Marriage.aspx">Gallup</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/05/most-americans-now-favor-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gay Couple Weds As Flight Veers Over Canadian Airspace</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/11/gay-couple-weds-as-flight-veers-over-canadian-airspace/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/11/gay-couple-weds-as-flight-veers-over-canadian-airspace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:22:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pelliciari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equal Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Atlantic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virgin Atlantic Airways]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wedding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=40753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px 20px;" title="Virgin Atlantic Airways" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/Virgin.b747-400.g-vbig.arp.jpg" alt="" width="231" height="162" />Some couples dream of lavish white weddings in a chapel. Some think of a small ceremony on the beach. Others think of interesting ways just to make their marriage legal. From <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/gay-couple-weds-flight-veers-canadian-airspace/">The Raw Story</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Same-sex marriages are not legal in most US states, so some gay  couples are finding creative ways to tie the knot.</p>
<p>Matt Mullenweg, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Mullenweg">founder of WordPress</a>,  announced Thursday that he had witnessed a gay couple get married on a  redeye flight from San Francisco to New York as it briefly crossed into  Canadian airpace.</p>
<p>&#8220;There was a wedding on my @VirginAmerica flight to New York! The  captain flew briefly over Canadian airspace so two gentleman could  marry,&#8221; <a href="http://twitter.com/#%21/photomatt/status/5257204277977089">Mullenweg  tweeted</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>[Continues at <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/gay-couple-weds-flight-veers-canadian-airspace/">The Raw Story</a>]</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px 20px;" title="Virgin Atlantic Airways" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/e/e3/Virgin.b747-400.g-vbig.arp.jpg" alt="" width="231" height="162" />Some couples dream of lavish white weddings in a chapel. Some think of a small ceremony on the beach. Others think of interesting ways just to make their marriage legal. From <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/gay-couple-weds-flight-veers-canadian-airspace/">The Raw Story</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Same-sex marriages are not legal in most US states, so some gay  couples are finding creative ways to tie the knot.</p>
<p>Matt Mullenweg, the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matt_Mullenweg">founder of WordPress</a>,  announced Thursday that he had witnessed a gay couple get married on a  redeye flight from San Francisco to New York as it briefly crossed into  Canadian airpace.</p>
<p>&#8220;There was a wedding on my @VirginAmerica flight to New York! The  captain flew briefly over Canadian airspace so two gentleman could  marry,&#8221; <a href="http://twitter.com/#%21/photomatt/status/5257204277977089">Mullenweg  tweeted</a>.</p></blockquote>
<p>[Continues at <a href="http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/gay-couple-weds-flight-veers-canadian-airspace/">The Raw Story</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/11/gay-couple-weds-as-flight-veers-over-canadian-airspace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposition 8 Invalidated, Same-Sex Marriage On Hold</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/08/proposition-8-invalidated-same-sex-marriage-on-hold/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/08/proposition-8-invalidated-same-sex-marriage-on-hold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pelliciari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[California]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Equality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Proposition 8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vaughn R. Walker]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=34551</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px 20px;" title="Prop. 8 crowd" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/CACourt_protest.jpg" alt="" width="188" height="252" />&#8220;I know pronounce you man and man, wait, not now, maybe later.&#8221; What are you doing California? From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">NY Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Eight days after ruling that Proposition 8 — a 2008 voter-approved ban on  same-sex marriage — was unconstitutional, a federal judge on Thursday denied a motion to stay his  decision, opening the door for untold numbers of gay and lesbian couples  to wed in the nation’s most populous state. But the judge delayed the  effective date of his order until Wednesday.</p>
<p><a title="More articles about Vaughn R. Walker." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/w/vaughn_r_walker/index.html?inline=nyt-per">Vaughn  R. Walker</a>, the chief judge of Federal District Court in San  Francisco, issued a temporary stay last week when he invalidated  Proposition 8, in order to allow arguments for and against same-sex  ceremonies being performed while supporters of the ban appealed.</p>
<p>On Thursday, Judge Walker declined to extend that stay, but built in the  delay to allow the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth  Circuit, where the case&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright" style="margin: 10px 20px;" title="Prop. 8 crowd" src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/10/CACourt_protest.jpg" alt="" width="188" height="252" />&#8220;I know pronounce you man and man, wait, not now, maybe later.&#8221; What are you doing California? From the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">NY Times</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Eight days after ruling that Proposition 8 — a 2008 voter-approved ban on  same-sex marriage — was unconstitutional, a federal judge on Thursday denied a motion to stay his  decision, opening the door for untold numbers of gay and lesbian couples  to wed in the nation’s most populous state. But the judge delayed the  effective date of his order until Wednesday.</p>
<p><a title="More articles about Vaughn R. Walker." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/w/vaughn_r_walker/index.html?inline=nyt-per">Vaughn  R. Walker</a>, the chief judge of Federal District Court in San  Francisco, issued a temporary stay last week when he invalidated  Proposition 8, in order to allow arguments for and against same-sex  ceremonies being performed while supporters of the ban appealed.</p>
<p>On Thursday, Judge Walker declined to extend that stay, but built in the  delay to allow the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth  Circuit, where the case has been appealed by proponents of Proposition  8, time to consider the matter.</p>
<p>In the ruling, the judge wrote, “The evidence presented at trial and the  position of representatives of the state of California show that an  injunction against enforcement of Proposition 8 is in the public’s  interest.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Continues at <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/13/us/13prop.html">NY Times</a> &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/08/proposition-8-invalidated-same-sex-marriage-on-hold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Are Lesbians Better Than Straights At Raising Children?</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/06/are-lesbians-better-than-straights-at-raising-children/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/06/are-lesbians-better-than-straights-at-raising-children/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JacobSloan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=31154</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1568207/Lesbian-parents-can-both-be-called-mother.html"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-31159" title="news-graphics-2007-_649744a" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/news-graphics-2007-_649744a.jpg" alt="news-graphics-2007-_649744a" width="200" /></a>Opponents of gay adoption argue that the ideal family is based around a man and a woman, and that all children deserve the best. But a new study reports that kids raised by lesbian couples (or single lesbian mothers) are actually psychologically healthier and do better in school than those raised by heterosexual parents &#8212; is it time for all children to be mandatorily handed over to lesbians for rearing? <a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1994480,00.html">Time</a> writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Children in lesbian homes scored higher than kids in straight families on some psychological measures of self-esteem and confidence, did better academically and were less likely to have behavioral problems, such as rule-breaking and aggression.</p>
<p>&#8220;We simply expected to find no difference in psychological adjustment between adolescents reared in lesbian families and the normative sample of age-matched controls,&#8221; says Gartrell. &#8220;I was surprised to find that on some measures we found higher levels of [psychological] competency and lower levels of behavioral&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1568207/Lesbian-parents-can-both-be-called-mother.html"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-31159" title="news-graphics-2007-_649744a" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/06/news-graphics-2007-_649744a.jpg" alt="news-graphics-2007-_649744a" width="200" /></a>Opponents of gay adoption argue that the ideal family is based around a man and a woman, and that all children deserve the best. But a new study reports that kids raised by lesbian couples (or single lesbian mothers) are actually psychologically healthier and do better in school than those raised by heterosexual parents &#8212; is it time for all children to be mandatorily handed over to lesbians for rearing? <a href="http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1994480,00.html">Time</a> writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>Children in lesbian homes scored higher than kids in straight families on some psychological measures of self-esteem and confidence, did better academically and were less likely to have behavioral problems, such as rule-breaking and aggression.</p>
<p>&#8220;We simply expected to find no difference in psychological adjustment between adolescents reared in lesbian families and the normative sample of age-matched controls,&#8221; says Gartrell. &#8220;I was surprised to find that on some measures we found higher levels of [psychological] competency and lower levels of behavioral problems. It wasn&#8217;t something I anticipated.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/06/are-lesbians-better-than-straights-at-raising-children/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Catholic Churches Raise Funds To Battle Gay Marriage</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/catholic-churches-raise-funds-to-battle-gay-marriage/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/catholic-churches-raise-funds-to-battle-gay-marriage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>majestic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Catholic Church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gay Marriage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=15632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://ncronline.org/files/imagecache/leadimage_full/maine_marriage.jpg" title="Catholics for Marriage Equality at the Holiday Inn, Portland, Maine on election night. " class="alignright" width="240" height="173" />A tip from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1934708046?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=disinformation&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=1934708046"><em>Hamptons Dictionary</em></a> author Miles Jaffe led us to this report in the <a href="http://ncronline.org/news/politics/dioceses-major-contributors-repeal-same-sex-marriage">National Catholic Reporter</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Gathering money from 50 U.S. dioceses, the Portland, Maine, diocese contributed more than $550,000 to the campaign to rejecte Maine&#8217;s law extending civil marriage to gay and lesbian couples, according to financial records filed with the state agency that tracks political contributions.</p>
<p>In the Nov. 3 referendum, Maine voters rejected 53 to 47 percent the same-sex marriage law.</p>
<p>Supporters and opponents of the law spent more than $7 million, according to the Portland Press Herald.</p>
<p>During the summer, Bishop Richard J. Malone of Portland sent an appeal to other Catholic bishops seeking contributions to defeat the law that the state legislature passed and the governor signed in May.</p>
<p>According to financial records filed with Maine&#8217;s campaign finance watchdog, the Portland diocese donated nearly $286,000 to Stand For Marriage Maine, which was seeking to repeal the same-sex law. Malone&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="" src="http://ncronline.org/files/imagecache/leadimage_full/maine_marriage.jpg" title="Catholics for Marriage Equality at the Holiday Inn, Portland, Maine on election night. " class="alignright" width="240" height="173" />A tip from <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1934708046?ie=UTF8&#038;tag=disinformation&#038;linkCode=as2&#038;camp=1789&#038;creative=390957&#038;creativeASIN=1934708046"><em>Hamptons Dictionary</em></a> author Miles Jaffe led us to this report in the <a href="http://ncronline.org/news/politics/dioceses-major-contributors-repeal-same-sex-marriage">National Catholic Reporter</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Gathering money from 50 U.S. dioceses, the Portland, Maine, diocese contributed more than $550,000 to the campaign to rejecte Maine&#8217;s law extending civil marriage to gay and lesbian couples, according to financial records filed with the state agency that tracks political contributions.</p>
<p>In the Nov. 3 referendum, Maine voters rejected 53 to 47 percent the same-sex marriage law.</p>
<p>Supporters and opponents of the law spent more than $7 million, according to the Portland Press Herald.</p>
<p>During the summer, Bishop Richard J. Malone of Portland sent an appeal to other Catholic bishops seeking contributions to defeat the law that the state legislature passed and the governor signed in May.</p>
<p>According to financial records filed with Maine&#8217;s campaign finance watchdog, the Portland diocese donated nearly $286,000 to Stand For Marriage Maine, which was seeking to repeal the same-sex law. Malone had ordered a second collection be taken up at Masses one September weekend which netted $86,000.</p>
<p>After Portland, Maine, the largest diocesan contributors were the Philadelphia archdiocese and Phoenix diocese, each giving $50,000. The sees of Newark, N.J., St. Louis, Mo., and Youngstown, Ohio, each contributed $10,000. The Diocesan Assistance Fund of Providence, R.I., gave $10,000.00.</p>
<p>Contributing $5,000 were the dioceses of Arlington, Va., Rockford, Ill., Crookston, Minn., and Pittsburgh, Pa. The Roman Catholic Foundation in the Archdiocese of Baltimore, Inc. donated $2,500&#8230;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/catholic-churches-raise-funds-to-battle-gay-marriage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

