<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
>

<channel>
	<title>Disinformation &#187; Physics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disinfo.com/tag/physics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disinfo.com</link>
	<description>alternative views, news &#38; information—online, video and print</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:51:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<!-- podcast_generator="Blubrry PowerPress/1.0.5" mode="advanced" entry="advanced" -->
	<itunes:summary>alternative views, news &amp; information—online, video and print</itunes:summary>
	<itunes:author>Disinformation</itunes:author>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<itunes:image href="/export/apache/www/squawk/disinfo/wp-content/themes/Disinformation/plugins/powerpress/itunes_default.jpg" />
	<itunes:subtitle>alternative views, news &amp; information—online, video and print</itunes:subtitle>
	
		<item>
		<title>Mega Shark Attack on Airplane Explained by Physics</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/03/mega-shark-attack-on-airplane-explained-by-physics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/03/mega-shark-attack-on-airplane-explained-by-physics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 20:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Bernardo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Movies]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shark Attack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=24097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Now this is entertainment. But here's the real life physics behind it (<a href="http://staubman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/megashark.pdf">click here</a>). Stephen Tauban writes on <a href="http://staubman.com/blog/?p=67#">his blog</a>:
<blockquote>Last year, I discovered the wonderfully cheezy and sharky movie: <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1350498">Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus</a></em>. While it certainly appealed to a more straight-to-DVD niche market of creature-feature enthusiasts, it wasn’t half bad. Pretty laughable in parts … well actually, in most parts when you consider the wooden acting and crap computer animation. However the most ridiculous scene has to be when Mega Shark takes down a commercial jetliner that is cruising over the middle of the ocean. It was this moment that took the movie from being a little ho-hum to “holy shit, did that shark just eat a plane!?” Check out the clip:

<object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/I16_8l0yS-g&#38;hl=en_US&#38;fs=1&#38;color1=0x5d1719&#38;color2=0xcd311b" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/I16_8l0yS-g&#38;hl=en_US&#38;fs=1&#38;color1=0x5d1719&#38;color2=0xcd311b" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object>

It’s pretty incredible when you think about it. I mean, how the hell did it do that? What would it require for a shark the size of a plane to launch itself out of the water and take down a moving aircraft? After reviewing some of my basic physics calculations I came up with some pretty startling figures. However, it didn’t feel like I would be doing such an epic event justice with just a <a href="http://staubman.com/blog/?p=67#">basic blog post</a>, which meant it was time to do what I love most: an infographic! I had been itching to do one for a while now, and this seemed like the perfect opportunity. So with all that said, check out the resulting design below. Oh, and just click on the image to <a href="http://staubman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/megashark.pdf">download the full size PDF version</a> for the smaller details.</blockquote>
<a href="http://staubman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/megashark.pdf"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24098" title="Megashark" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Megashark.jpg" alt="Megashark" width="650" height="339" /></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now this is entertainment. But here&#8217;s the real life physics behind it (<a href="http://staubman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/megashark.pdf">click here</a>). Stephen Tauban writes on <a href="http://staubman.com/blog/?p=67#">his blog</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Last year, I discovered the wonderfully cheezy and sharky movie: <em><a href="http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1350498">Mega Shark Vs. Giant Octopus</a></em>. While it certainly appealed to a more straight-to-DVD niche market of creature-feature enthusiasts, it wasn’t half bad. Pretty laughable in parts … well actually, in most parts when you consider the wooden acting and crap computer animation. However the most ridiculous scene has to be when Mega Shark takes down a commercial jetliner that is cruising over the middle of the ocean. It was this moment that took the movie from being a little ho-hum to “holy shit, did that shark just eat a plane!?” Check out the clip:</p>
<p><object classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="480" height="385" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/I16_8l0yS-g&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="480" height="385" src="http://www.youtube.com/v/I16_8l0yS-g&amp;hl=en_US&amp;fs=1&amp;color1=0x5d1719&amp;color2=0xcd311b" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></object></p>
<p>It’s pretty incredible when you think about it. I mean, how the hell did it do that? What would it require for a shark the size of a plane to launch itself out of the water and take down a moving aircraft? After reviewing some of my basic physics calculations I came up with some pretty startling figures. However, it didn’t feel like I would be doing such an epic event justice with just a <a href="http://staubman.com/blog/?p=67#">basic blog post</a>, which meant it was time to do what I love most: an infographic! I had been itching to do one for a while now, and this seemed like the perfect opportunity. So with all that said, check out the resulting design below. Oh, and just click on the image to <a href="http://staubman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/megashark.pdf">download the full size PDF version</a> for the smaller details.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://staubman.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/megashark.pdf"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-24098" title="Megashark" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/Megashark.jpg" alt="Megashark" width="650" height="339" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/03/mega-shark-attack-on-airplane-explained-by-physics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A New Look at Newton&#8217;s Second Law Could Explain Away the Existence of Dark Matter</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/03/a-new-look-at-newtons-second-law-could-explain-away-the-existence-of-dark-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/03/a-new-look-at-newtons-second-law-could-explain-away-the-existence-of-dark-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 04:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Raymond</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Space]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=23677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-03/spinning-disc-could-test-modified-newtonian-physics-and-kill-dark-matter-explanation">PopSci</a>:<img class="alignright" style="border: 10px solid white;" src="http://www.popsci.com/files/imagecache/article_image_large/articles/dark%20matter.jpg" alt="" width="264" height="202" /></p>
<blockquote><p>And all it takes to measure is a simple spinning disk here on Earth.  When reached for comment, Dark Matter says: &#8220;Come on, you almost found  me!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Dark matter&#8217;s status as a mysterious and invisible lurker in the  universe has frustrated scientists for years. Now, one hopes to solve  the puzzle a different way: using a modified version of Newton&#8217;s second  law that would eliminate the need for dark matter altogether.  Researchers in Brazil have devised an experiment that could put the  modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) to the test, <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527493.900-dark-matter-could-meet-its-nemesis-on-earth.html?full=true&#38;print=true"><em>New  Scientist</em></a> reports.</p>
<p>Much <a href="http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-amp-space/article/2009-05/new-evidence-dark-matter">indirect  evidence</a> for dark matter &#8212; supposedly 25 percent of the mass in  the universe &#8212; comes from observing its invisible gravitational effect  on visible galaxies and their stars. Deep <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2009-12/evidence-dark-matter-emerges-worlds-most-sensative-detector">underground  experiments</a> on Earth have attempted to <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2009-12/shadow-complex-dark-matter-discovery-resurfaces-mine">directly  detect</a> the weakly interacting&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-03/spinning-disc-could-test-modified-newtonian-physics-and-kill-dark-matter-explanation">PopSci</a>:<img class="alignright" style="border: 10px solid white;" src="http://www.popsci.com/files/imagecache/article_image_large/articles/dark%20matter.jpg" alt="" width="264" height="202" /></p>
<blockquote><p>And all it takes to measure is a simple spinning disk here on Earth.  When reached for comment, Dark Matter says: &#8220;Come on, you almost found  me!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote><p>Dark matter&#8217;s status as a mysterious and invisible lurker in the  universe has frustrated scientists for years. Now, one hopes to solve  the puzzle a different way: using a modified version of Newton&#8217;s second  law that would eliminate the need for dark matter altogether.  Researchers in Brazil have devised an experiment that could put the  modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) to the test, <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527493.900-dark-matter-could-meet-its-nemesis-on-earth.html?full=true&amp;print=true"><em>New  Scientist</em></a> reports.</p>
<p>Much <a href="http://www.popsci.com/military-aviation-amp-space/article/2009-05/new-evidence-dark-matter">indirect  evidence</a> for dark matter &#8212; supposedly 25 percent of the mass in  the universe &#8212; comes from observing its invisible gravitational effect  on visible galaxies and their stars. Deep <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2009-12/evidence-dark-matter-emerges-worlds-most-sensative-detector">underground  experiments</a> on Earth have attempted to <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2009-12/shadow-complex-dark-matter-discovery-resurfaces-mine">directly  detect</a> the weakly interacting particles (WIMPS) that scientists  believe constitute dark matter.</p>
<p>But dark matter&#8217;s existence is based on the assumption that Newton&#8217;s  second law of motion holds true at all physical scales. In 1981, Israeli  physicist Mordehai Milgrom hypothesized that Newton&#8217;s second law might  change slightly at extremely small accelerations. That MOND proposal  could in turn explain the irregularities astrophysicists have observed  in the motion of galaxies and stars without the need for dark matter.</p></blockquote>
<p>[Read more at <a href="http://www.popsci.com/science/article/2010-03/spinning-disc-could-test-modified-newtonian-physics-and-kill-dark-matter-explanation">PopSci</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/03/a-new-look-at-newtons-second-law-could-explain-away-the-existence-of-dark-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The First Test That Proves General Theory of Relativity Wrong</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/the-first-test-that-proves-general-theory-of-relativity-wrong/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/the-first-test-that-proves-general-theory-of-relativity-wrong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phunkychic666</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Einstein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Theory of Relativity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=23557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Vlad Tarko writes on <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-First-Test-That-Proves-General-Theory-of-Relativity-Wrong-20259.shtml?utm_source=twitterfeed&#38;utm_medium=twitter">Softpedia</a>:<br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-23558" style="margin-bottom: 10px; margin-right: 20px; margin-top: 5px;" title="Relativity Is Wrong?" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/RelativityIsWrong.jpg" alt="Relativity Is Wrong?" width="208" height="170" />According to Einstein&#8217;s theory of general relativity, a moving mass should create another field, called gravitomagnetic field, besides its static gravitational field. This field has now been measured for the first time and to the scientists&#8217; astonishment, it proved to be no less than one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein&#8217;s General Relativity predicts.</p>
<blockquote><p>This gravitomagnetic field is similar to the magnetic field produced by a moving electric charge (hence the name &#8220;gravitomagnetic&#8221; analogous to &#8220;electromagnetic&#8221;). For example, the electric charges moving in a coil produce a magnetic field — such a coil behaves like a magnet. Similarly, the gravitomagnetic field can be produced to be a mass moving in a circle. What the electric charge is for electromagnetism, mass is for gravitation theory (the general&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vlad Tarko writes on <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-First-Test-That-Proves-General-Theory-of-Relativity-Wrong-20259.shtml?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">Softpedia</a>:<br />
<img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-23558" style="margin-bottom: 10px; margin-right: 20px; margin-top: 5px;" title="Relativity Is Wrong?" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/RelativityIsWrong.jpg" alt="Relativity Is Wrong?" width="208" height="170" />According to Einstein&#8217;s theory of general relativity, a moving mass should create another field, called gravitomagnetic field, besides its static gravitational field. This field has now been measured for the first time and to the scientists&#8217; astonishment, it proved to be no less than one hundred million trillion times larger than Einstein&#8217;s General Relativity predicts.</p>
<blockquote><p>This gravitomagnetic field is similar to the magnetic field produced by a moving electric charge (hence the name &#8220;gravitomagnetic&#8221; analogous to &#8220;electromagnetic&#8221;). For example, the electric charges moving in a coil produce a magnetic field — such a coil behaves like a magnet. Similarly, the gravitomagnetic field can be produced to be a mass moving in a circle. What the electric charge is for electromagnetism, mass is for gravitation theory (the general theory of relativity).</p>
<p>A spinning top weights more than the same top standing still. However, according to Einstein&#8217;s theory, the difference is negligible. It should be so small that we shouldn&#8217;t even be capable of measuring it. But now scientists from the European Space Agancy, Martin Tajmar, Clovis de Matos and their colleagues, have actually measured it. At first they couldn&#8217;t believe the result.</p></blockquote>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://news.softpedia.com/news/The-First-Test-That-Proves-General-Theory-of-Relativity-Wrong-20259.shtml?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;utm_medium=twitter">Softpedia</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/the-first-test-that-proves-general-theory-of-relativity-wrong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coast to Coast AM: Time Technology &amp; Research</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/coast-to-coast-am-time-technology-research/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/coast-to-coast-am-time-technology-research/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 08:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>phunkychic666</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Coast to Coast AM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[David Anderson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Travel]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=22144</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From the January 31, 2010 show of <a href="http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2010/01/31">Coast to Coast AM</a>:
<a href="http://www.andersoninstitute.com"><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/TimeControl.jpg" alt="TimeControl" title="TimeControl" class="alignright size-full wp-image-22146" width="173" height="240" /></a>
<blockquote>Joining Art Bell for the entire 4-hour program, physicist <a href="http://www.andersoninstitute.com/david-lewis-anderson-biography.html">Dr. David Anderson</a> discussed the state of time technology from his research, as well as other labs around the world. He recapped his work from 2002, when he last appeared with Art on the show. At that juncture, his team had created small time warp fields that he said could accelerate time by 300% within the field, as well as reversing time. He described the initiation of a time warp field as quite spectacular to witness, "between the combinations of different chemical reagents and high energy lasers we use to excite or initiate a time warp field...a lot of light, a lot of energy."

Since 2002, the effects have increased by "two orders of magnitudes," both in time acceleration and retardation rates, and living organisms have been successfully tested in the warp fields, he detailed. By regenerating "closed timelike curves" (bending spacetime so time loops back on itself) we're finding it "just as easy to move backwards in time as well as forward," Anderson explained.</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From the January 31, 2010 show of <a href="http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2010/01/31">Coast to Coast AM</a>:<br />
<a href="http://www.andersoninstitute.com"><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/TimeControl.jpg" alt="TimeControl" title="TimeControl" class="alignright size-full wp-image-22146" width="173" height="240" /></a></p>
<blockquote><p>Joining Art Bell for the entire 4-hour program, physicist <a href="http://www.andersoninstitute.com/david-lewis-anderson-biography.html">Dr. David Anderson</a> discussed the state of time technology from his research, as well as other labs around the world. He recapped his work from 2002, when he last appeared with Art on the show. At that juncture, his team had created small time warp fields that he said could accelerate time by 300% within the field, as well as reversing time. He described the initiation of a time warp field as quite spectacular to witness, &#8220;between the combinations of different chemical reagents and high energy lasers we use to excite or initiate a time warp field&#8230;a lot of light, a lot of energy.&#8221;</p>
<p>Since 2002, the effects have increased by &#8220;two orders of magnitudes,&#8221; both in time acceleration and retardation rates, and living organisms have been successfully tested in the warp fields, he detailed. By regenerating &#8220;closed timelike curves&#8221; (bending spacetime so time loops back on itself) we&#8217;re finding it &#8220;just as easy to move backwards in time as well as forward,&#8221; Anderson explained.</p></blockquote>
<p>Listen on <a href="http://www.coasttocoastam.com/show/2010/01/31">Coast to Coast AM</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/coast-to-coast-am-time-technology-research/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Would You See As You Plummet Into a Black Hole? (Video)</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/what-would-you-see-as-you-plummet-into-a-black-hole-video/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/what-would-you-see-as-you-plummet-into-a-black-hole-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 00:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Bernardo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bizarre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Universe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=22005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hazel Muir writes on <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18498-new-black-hole-simulator-uses-real-star-data.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&#38;nsref=online-news">New Scientist</a>:
<blockquote>A new interactive program reveals the spectacular light show you'd see if you dared to wander close to a black hole. It demonstrates how the extreme gravity of a black hole could appear to shred background constellations of stars, spinning them around as though in a giant black washing machine.

The program's creators say it could be an excellent tool to familiarise people with the weird ways that black holes warp light. "It's useful for people to play around with the parameters to study how, for instance, a black hole would distort the constellation Orion," says Thomas Müller of the University of Stuttgart in Germany.</blockquote>
<object id="flashObj" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="486" height="412" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=65768875001&#38;playerID=2227271001&#38;domain=embed&#38;" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/2227271001?isVid=1&#38;publisherID=981571807" /><param name="name" value="flashObj" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoId=65768875001&#38;playerID=2227271001&#38;domain=embed&#38;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="flashObj" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="486" height="412" src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/2227271001?isVid=1&#38;publisherID=981571807" name="flashObj" allowscriptaccess="always" swliveconnect="true" allowfullscreen="true" seamlesstabbing="false" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" flashvars="videoId=65768875001&#38;playerID=2227271001&#38;domain=embed&#38;" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"></embed></object>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hazel Muir writes on <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18498-new-black-hole-simulator-uses-real-star-data.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;nsref=online-news">New Scientist</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>A new interactive program reveals the spectacular light show you&#8217;d see if you dared to wander close to a black hole. It demonstrates how the extreme gravity of a black hole could appear to shred background constellations of stars, spinning them around as though in a giant black washing machine.</p>
<p>The program&#8217;s creators say it could be an excellent tool to familiarise people with the weird ways that black holes warp light. &#8220;It&#8217;s useful for people to play around with the parameters to study how, for instance, a black hole would distort the constellation Orion,&#8221; says Thomas Müller of the University of Stuttgart in Germany.</p></blockquote>
<p><object id="flashObj" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="486" height="412" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=65768875001&amp;playerID=2227271001&amp;domain=embed&amp;" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/2227271001?isVid=1&amp;publisherID=981571807" /><param name="name" value="flashObj" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoId=65768875001&amp;playerID=2227271001&amp;domain=embed&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="flashObj" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="486" height="412" src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/2227271001?isVid=1&amp;publisherID=981571807" name="flashObj" allowscriptaccess="always" swliveconnect="true" allowfullscreen="true" seamlesstabbing="false" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" flashvars="videoId=65768875001&amp;playerID=2227271001&amp;domain=embed&amp;" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"></embed></object></p>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn18498-new-black-hole-simulator-uses-real-star-data.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;nsref=online-news">New Scientist</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/what-would-you-see-as-you-plummet-into-a-black-hole-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Strangest Liquid: Why Water Is So Weird</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/the-strangest-liquid-why-water-is-so-weird/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/the-strangest-liquid-why-water-is-so-weird/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Bernardo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bizarre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Life]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Strange Science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Water]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=21973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With a massive blizzard going on in the Northeastern U.S., water (albeit in a frozen form) is on everyone's mind in this part of the world. Very interesting article, whether you are snowed in or not. Edwin Cartlidge writes in <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527466.200-the-strangest-liquid-why-water-is-so-weird.html#">New Scientist</a>:
<img style="margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-top: 15px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Ice.jpg" alt="Ice" title="Ice" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-21974" width="271" height="253" />
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">We are confronted by many mysteries, from the nature of dark matter and the origin of the universe to the quest for a theory of everything. These are all puzzles on the grand scale, but you can observe another enduring mystery of the physical world — equally perplexing, if not quite so grand — from the comfort of your kitchen. Simply fill a tall glass with chilled water, throw in an ice cube and leave it to stand.</p>

The fact that the ice cube floats is the first oddity. And the mystery deepens if you take a thermometer and measure the temperature of the water at various depths. At the top, near the ice cube, you'll find it to be around 0 °C, but at the bottom it should be about 4 °C. That's because water is denser at 4°C than it is at any other temperature — another strange trait that sets it apart from other liquids.</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With a massive blizzard going on in the Northeastern U.S., water (albeit in a frozen form) is on everyone&#8217;s mind in this part of the world. Very interesting article, whether you are snowed in or not. Edwin Cartlidge writes in <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527466.200-the-strangest-liquid-why-water-is-so-weird.html#">New Scientist</a>:<br />
<img style="margin-right: 20px; margin-bottom: 5px; margin-top: 15px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/Ice.jpg" alt="Ice" title="Ice" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-21974" width="271" height="253" /></p>
<blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">We are confronted by many mysteries, from the nature of dark matter and the origin of the universe to the quest for a theory of everything. These are all puzzles on the grand scale, but you can observe another enduring mystery of the physical world — equally perplexing, if not quite so grand — from the comfort of your kitchen. Simply fill a tall glass with chilled water, throw in an ice cube and leave it to stand.</p>
<p>The fact that the ice cube floats is the first oddity. And the mystery deepens if you take a thermometer and measure the temperature of the water at various depths. At the top, near the ice cube, you&#8217;ll find it to be around 0 °C, but at the bottom it should be about 4 °C. That&#8217;s because water is denser at 4°C than it is at any other temperature — another strange trait that sets it apart from other liquids.</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Water&#8217;s odd properties don&#8217;t stop there, and some are vital to life. Because ice is less dense than water, and water is less dense at its freezing point than when it is slightly warmer, it freezes from the top down rather than the bottom up. So even during the ice ages, life continued to thrive on lake floors and in the deep ocean. Water also has an extraordinary capacity to mop up heat, and this helps smooth out climatic changes that could otherwise devastate ecosystems.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="text-align: left;">Image via <a href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Eis-3.jpg">Wikimedia Commons</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Read More: <a href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527466.200-the-strangest-liquid-why-water-is-so-weird.html#">New Scientist</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/02/the-strangest-liquid-why-water-is-so-weird/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Fall 35,000 Feet — And Survive</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/01/how-to-fall-35000-feet-%e2%80%94-and-survive/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/01/how-to-fall-35000-feet-%e2%80%94-and-survive/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Bernardo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Air Travel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Forteana]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gravity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WTF]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=21111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ParachuteOnFire.jpg" alt="Parachute On Fire" title="Parachute On Fire" class="alignright size-full wp-image-21112" height="257" width="227" />Dan Koeppel writes in <a href="http://www.origin.popularmechanics.com/science/air_space/4344036.html">Popular Mechanics</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>You&#8217;re six miles up, alone and falling without a parachute. Though the odds are long, a small number of people have found themselves in similar situations — and lived to tell the tale. </strong></p>
<p><em>6:59:00 AM, 35,000 Feet:</em> You have a late night and an early flight. Not long after takeoff, you drift to sleep. Suddenly, you’re wide awake. There’s cold air rushing everywhere, and sound. Intense, horrible sound. Where am I?, you think. Where’s the plane?</p>
<p>You’re 6 miles up. You’re alone. You’re falling.</p>
<p>Things are bad. But now’s the time to focus on the good news. (Yes, it goes beyond surviving the destruction of your aircraft.) Although gravity is against you, another force is working in your favor: time. Believe it or not, you’re better off up&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin-left: 20px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/ParachuteOnFire.jpg" alt="Parachute On Fire" title="Parachute On Fire" class="alignright size-full wp-image-21112" height="257" width="227" />Dan Koeppel writes in <a href="http://www.origin.popularmechanics.com/science/air_space/4344036.html">Popular Mechanics</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>You&#8217;re six miles up, alone and falling without a parachute. Though the odds are long, a small number of people have found themselves in similar situations — and lived to tell the tale. </strong></p>
<p><em>6:59:00 AM, 35,000 Feet:</em> You have a late night and an early flight. Not long after takeoff, you drift to sleep. Suddenly, you’re wide awake. There’s cold air rushing everywhere, and sound. Intense, horrible sound. Where am I?, you think. Where’s the plane?</p>
<p>You’re 6 miles up. You’re alone. You’re falling.</p>
<p>Things are bad. But now’s the time to focus on the good news. (Yes, it goes beyond surviving the destruction of your aircraft.) Although gravity is against you, another force is working in your favor: time. Believe it or not, you’re better off up here than if you’d slipped from the balcony of your high-rise hotel room after one too many drinks last night.</p>
<p>Or at least you will be. Oxygen is scarce at these heights. By now, hypoxia is starting to set in. You’ll be unconscious soon, and you’ll cannonball at least a mile before waking up again. When that happens, remember what you are about to read. The ground, after all, is your next destination.</p>
<p>Granted, the odds of surviving a 6-mile plummet are extra­ordinarily slim, but at this point you’ve got nothing to lose by understanding your situation. There are two ways to fall out of a plane. The first is to free-fall, or drop from the sky with absolutely no protection or means of slowing your descent. The second is to become a wreckage rider, a term coined by Massachusetts-based amateur historian Jim Hamilton, who developed the <a href="http://www.greenharbor.com/fffolder/ffresearch.html">Free Fall Research Page</a><a> — an online database of nearly every imaginable human plummet&#8230;</a></p></blockquote>
<p>Read More: <a href="http://www.origin.popularmechanics.com/science/air_space/4344036.html">Popular Mechanics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2010/01/how-to-fall-35000-feet-%e2%80%94-and-survive/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>They&#8217;ve Made Real Lightsabers (Kinda)</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/theyve-made-real-lightsabers-kinda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/theyve-made-real-lightsabers-kinda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 08:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Bernardo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Futurism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pop Culture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Television]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=15834</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<img style="margin-left: 15px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/RealLightsabers.jpg" alt="RealLightsabers" title="RealLightsabers" class="size-full wp-image-15835 alignright" width="383" height="255" />Graeme McMillan writes on <a href="http://io9.com/5414133/omfg-theyve-made-real-lightsabers-kinda">io9.com</a>:
<blockquote>An upcoming television show explains why real life lightsabers are a physical impossibility, before building the next best thing. It's like <em>Mythbusters</em> but, surprisingly, made with even more awesome.

According to <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/bltv/2009/11/geek-alert-science-channel-builds-a-lightsaber-2.html">Variety</a>, the show, <em>Sci-Fi Science: Physics of the Impossible</em>, will feature Dr. Michio Kaku looking at the reality behind Star Wars' favored weapon of choice. After explaining that light can't be formed into a solid blade, Jedi-style, he then goes to work looking for alternatives, including plasma swords and carbon nano-tubes, with the help of experts in the field. As you can see from the pic, he apparently succeeds. My mind is almost so blown that I forgot to say that I really, really want to see lightsaber battles as part of the Olympics now.</blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="margin-left: 15px; margin-bottom: 10px;" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/RealLightsabers.jpg" alt="RealLightsabers" title="RealLightsabers" class="size-full wp-image-15835 alignright" width="383" height="255" />Graeme McMillan writes on <a href="http://io9.com/5414133/omfg-theyve-made-real-lightsabers-kinda">io9.com</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>An upcoming television show explains why real life lightsabers are a physical impossibility, before building the next best thing. It&#8217;s like <em>Mythbusters</em> but, surprisingly, made with even more awesome.</p>
<p>According to <a href="http://weblogs.variety.com/bltv/2009/11/geek-alert-science-channel-builds-a-lightsaber-2.html">Variety</a>, the show, <em>Sci-Fi Science: Physics of the Impossible</em>, will feature Dr. Michio Kaku looking at the reality behind Star Wars&#8217; favored weapon of choice. After explaining that light can&#8217;t be formed into a solid blade, Jedi-style, he then goes to work looking for alternatives, including plasma swords and carbon nano-tubes, with the help of experts in the field. As you can see from the pic, he apparently succeeds. My mind is almost so blown that I forgot to say that I really, really want to see lightsaber battles as part of the Olympics now.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/theyve-made-real-lightsabers-kinda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Chinese Scientists Create Artificial Black Hole</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/chinese-scientists-create-artificial-black-hole/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/chinese-scientists-create-artificial-black-hole/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 17:43:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>JacobSloan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Black Hole]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[End of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Physics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=13785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><i>Popular Science</i> reports on scientists messing around with something that <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-10/black-hole-fits-your-pocket">could cause the end of the world</a>: pocket-sized laboratory-made black holes.</p>
<p><i>Unlike a regular black hole, which traps light using the gravitational pull of the dead star at its core, this simple metal disc uses the geometry of 60 concentric rings of metamaterials to lock up light&#8230;bending beams into the center of the disc, and trapping them in the etched maze-like grooves.</i></p>
<p><img src="http://www.popsci.com/files/imagecache/article_image_large/files/articles/PocketBlackHole.jpg" width=450></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Popular Science</i> reports on scientists messing around with something that <a href="http://www.popsci.com/technology/article/2009-10/black-hole-fits-your-pocket">could cause the end of the world</a>: pocket-sized laboratory-made black holes.</p>
<p><i>Unlike a regular black hole, which traps light using the gravitational pull of the dead star at its core, this simple metal disc uses the geometry of 60 concentric rings of metamaterials to lock up light&#8230;bending beams into the center of the disc, and trapping them in the etched maze-like grooves.</i></p>
<p><img src="http://www.popsci.com/files/imagecache/article_image_large/files/articles/PocketBlackHole.jpg" width=450></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/chinese-scientists-create-artificial-black-hole/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
