<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Disinformation &#187; tobacco</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.disinfo.com/tag/tobacco/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.disinfo.com</link>
	<description>alternative views, news &#38; information—online, video and print</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Iceland Considers Making Cigarettes Prescription-Only</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/07/iceland-considers-making-cigarettes-prescription-only/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/07/iceland-considers-making-cigarettes-prescription-only/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 16:02:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pelliciari</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigarette sales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Iceland Parliament]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Medicine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[precription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reykjavik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=56579</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_56580" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 207px"><img class="size-full wp-image-56580 " style="margin: 10px 20px;" title="Cigarettelight" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Cigarettelight.JPG" alt="Photo: Hendrike (CC)" width="197" height="240" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: Hendrike (CC)</p></div>
<p>Cigarettes seem like the last thing a doctor would prescribe, but Iceland may be moving to outlaw the sale of cigarettes in stores and only allowing pharmacists to dispense them. The proposal was written in hopes of reducing the amount of smokers and emphasizing the health concerns rather than the marketing tactics. Those with a prescription for cigarettes will be considered addicts getting the chemicals their bodies have become accustomed to. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/04/iceland-considers-prescription-only-cigarettes">The Guardian</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote><p><a title="More from  guardian.co.uk on Iceland" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/iceland">Iceland</a> is considering banning the sale  of cigarettes and making them a prescription-only product.</p>
<p>The  parliament in Reykjavik is to debate a proposal that would outlaw the  sale of cigarettes in normal shops. Only pharmacies would be allowed to  dispense them – initially to those aged 20 and up, and eventually only  to those with a valid medical certificate.</p>
<p>The radical initiative  is part of a 10-year plan that also aims to ban <a title="More from  guardian.co.uk on Smoking" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/smoking">smoking</a> in all public places, including  pavements&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_56580" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 207px"><img class="size-full wp-image-56580 " style="margin: 10px 20px;" title="Cigarettelight" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/Cigarettelight.JPG" alt="Photo: Hendrike (CC)" width="197" height="240" /><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: Hendrike (CC)</p></div>
<p>Cigarettes seem like the last thing a doctor would prescribe, but Iceland may be moving to outlaw the sale of cigarettes in stores and only allowing pharmacists to dispense them. The proposal was written in hopes of reducing the amount of smokers and emphasizing the health concerns rather than the marketing tactics. Those with a prescription for cigarettes will be considered addicts getting the chemicals their bodies have become accustomed to. <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/04/iceland-considers-prescription-only-cigarettes">The Guardian</a> reports:</p>
<blockquote><p><a title="More from  guardian.co.uk on Iceland" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/iceland">Iceland</a> is considering banning the sale  of cigarettes and making them a prescription-only product.</p>
<p>The  parliament in Reykjavik is to debate a proposal that would outlaw the  sale of cigarettes in normal shops. Only pharmacies would be allowed to  dispense them – initially to those aged 20 and up, and eventually only  to those with a valid medical certificate.</p>
<p>The radical initiative  is part of a 10-year plan that also aims to ban <a title="More from  guardian.co.uk on Smoking" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/smoking">smoking</a> in all public places, including  pavements and parks, and in cars where children are present. Iceland  also wants to follow Australia&#8217;s lead by <a title="forcing tobacco manufacturers to sell cigarettes in plain brown  packaging" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/jun/27/philip-morris-australia-cigarettes-packaging">forcing tobacco manufacturers to sell cigarettes in plain,  brown packaging</a> plastered with health warnings rather than branding.</p></blockquote>
<p>[Continues at <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/jul/04/iceland-considers-prescription-only-cigarettes">The Guardian</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/07/iceland-considers-making-cigarettes-prescription-only/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey Smokers, You&#8217;re Killing The Fish</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/04/hey-smokers-youre-killing-the-fish/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/04/hey-smokers-youre-killing-the-fish/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>majestic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cigarettes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fish]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=52588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_52589" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Filthy_Habit_by_SillyPuttyEnemies.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-52589 " style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px;" title="769px-Filthy_Habit_by_SillyPuttyEnemies" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/769px-Filthy_Habit_by_SillyPuttyEnemies.jpg" alt="Photo: Sillyputtyenemies" width="300" height="234" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: Sillyputtyenemies (CC)</p></div>
<p>It turns out that fish are also helpless victims of smokers. No joke, as reported by Jeffrey Kluger for <a href="http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2011/04/27/a-new-victim-of-second-hand-smoking-fish/">TIME</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>For smokers, the world has always been one big ashtray, with cigarettes flicked away pretty much anywhere. That&#8217;s especially true now, since smokers are increasingly forbidden to light up in restaurants, office buildings and even new no-smoking condos. In the great river of litter human beings create each year, so tiny a thing as a cigarette butt hardly seems to amount to much. But with the world&#8217;s smokers burning through a breathtaking  5.6 trillion cigarettes per year — 4.5 trillion of which are simply tossed away outside after they&#8217;re smoked —  little things add up fast. That, as it turns out, can be especially dangerous for one type of nonhuman critter: fish.</p>
<p>About a third of all of the trash found on U.S. shorelines consists of cigarette butts. There&#8217;s no&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div id="attachment_52589" class="wp-caption alignright" style="width: 310px"><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Filthy_Habit_by_SillyPuttyEnemies.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-52589 " style="margin-top: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px; margin-left: 20px; margin-right: 20px;" title="769px-Filthy_Habit_by_SillyPuttyEnemies" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/769px-Filthy_Habit_by_SillyPuttyEnemies.jpg" alt="Photo: Sillyputtyenemies" width="300" height="234" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Photo: Sillyputtyenemies (CC)</p></div>
<p>It turns out that fish are also helpless victims of smokers. No joke, as reported by Jeffrey Kluger for <a href="http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2011/04/27/a-new-victim-of-second-hand-smoking-fish/">TIME</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>For smokers, the world has always been one big ashtray, with cigarettes flicked away pretty much anywhere. That&#8217;s especially true now, since smokers are increasingly forbidden to light up in restaurants, office buildings and even new no-smoking condos. In the great river of litter human beings create each year, so tiny a thing as a cigarette butt hardly seems to amount to much. But with the world&#8217;s smokers burning through a breathtaking  5.6 trillion cigarettes per year — 4.5 trillion of which are simply tossed away outside after they&#8217;re smoked —  little things add up fast. That, as it turns out, can be especially dangerous for one type of nonhuman critter: fish.</p>
<p>About a third of all of the trash found on U.S. shorelines consists of cigarette butts. There&#8217;s no such thing as good litter, but butts may be among the worst, since they&#8217;re impregnated with concentrated quantities of the 4,000 chemicals — many of them highly toxic — that occur naturally in tobacco and are added in the cigarette-manufacturing process. In a <a href="http://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/20/Suppl_1/i25.abstract?sid=9675e36e-c581-4ef7-abab-cc3aebe75e3d">new paper</a> published in the journal Tobacco Control, a team of researchers headed by Eli Slaughter of San Diego State University&#8217;s Graduate School of Public Health sought to determine the kind of harm those poisons can do.</p>
<p>Slaughter and his team broke cigarette waste down into three categories: smoked filters with some scraps of tobacco left; smoked filters with all of the tobacco burned or washed away; and unsmoked filters, which themselves contain a whole stew of chemicals. They immersed samples of each type of butt in separate 2-liter (.5 gal) containers of water and allowed them to soak. In some of the vessels, 16 butts were added to the water, in some 8, in some 4, 2, 1 or just a half a butt. After 24 hours, the butts were removed and  fish were added.</p>
<p>The two types of fish the researchers chose for their study were the topsmelt and fathead minnow, both common in U.S. waterways. All of the fish were 14 days old or younger. What Slaughter and his team were looking for was what&#8217;s known as the LC50 — the lethal concentration of cigarette butt leachate in water that would kill 50% of the sample&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>[continues at <a href="http://ecocentric.blogs.time.com/2011/04/27/a-new-victim-of-second-hand-smoking-fish/">TIME</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/04/hey-smokers-youre-killing-the-fish/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Smoking Damages Your Genes Within Minutes Of Lighting Up</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/01/smoking-damages-your-genes-within-minutes-of-lighting-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/01/smoking-damages-your-genes-within-minutes-of-lighting-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>majestic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Science & Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=44270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-41205" style="margin: 10px;" title="smoking" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/smoking-150x150.gif" alt="smoking" width="150" height="150" />Even the tobacco companies have had to concede that in the long-term smoking is disastrous for human bodies. Probably few people would have guessed just how fast the damage occurs, however. <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5htHaSh7d9pYNH0yi4I9STCzmj2Lw?docId=CNG.1013bcd54f88cdb52e0ba01db945fb52.1281">AFP</a> reports on a new study that should give cause to even those who think just an occasional puff will do no harm:</p>
<blockquote><p>Those first few puffs on a cigarette can within minutes cause genetic damage linked to cancer, US scientists said in a study released Saturday.</p>
<p>In fact, researchers said the &#8220;effect is so fast that it&#8217;s equivalent to injecting the substance directly into the bloodstream,&#8221; in findings described as a &#8220;stark warning&#8221; to those who smoke.</p>
<p>The study is the first on humans to track how substances in tobacco cause DNA damage, and appears in the peer-reviewed journal Chemical Research in Toxicology, issued by the American Chemical Society.</p>
<p>Using 12 volunteer smokers, scientists tracked pollutants called PAHs, or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, that&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-41205" style="margin: 10px;" title="smoking" src="http://disinfo.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/smoking-150x150.gif" alt="smoking" width="150" height="150" />Even the tobacco companies have had to concede that in the long-term smoking is disastrous for human bodies. Probably few people would have guessed just how fast the damage occurs, however. <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5htHaSh7d9pYNH0yi4I9STCzmj2Lw?docId=CNG.1013bcd54f88cdb52e0ba01db945fb52.1281">AFP</a> reports on a new study that should give cause to even those who think just an occasional puff will do no harm:</p>
<blockquote><p>Those first few puffs on a cigarette can within minutes cause genetic damage linked to cancer, US scientists said in a study released Saturday.</p>
<p>In fact, researchers said the &#8220;effect is so fast that it&#8217;s equivalent to injecting the substance directly into the bloodstream,&#8221; in findings described as a &#8220;stark warning&#8221; to those who smoke.</p>
<p>The study is the first on humans to track how substances in tobacco cause DNA damage, and appears in the peer-reviewed journal Chemical Research in Toxicology, issued by the American Chemical Society.</p>
<p>Using 12 volunteer smokers, scientists tracked pollutants called PAHs, or polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, that are carried in tobacco smoke and can also be found in coal-burning plants and in charred barbecue food.</p>
<p>They followed one particular type &#8212; phenanthrene, which is found in cigarette smoke &#8212; through the blood and saw it form a toxic substance that is known to &#8220;trash DNA, causing mutations that can cause cancer,&#8221; the study said.</p>
<p>&#8220;The smokers developed maximum levels of the substance in a time frame that surprised even the researchers: just 15-30 minutes after the volunteers finished smoking,&#8221; the study said&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>[continues at <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5htHaSh7d9pYNH0yi4I9STCzmj2Lw?docId=CNG.1013bcd54f88cdb52e0ba01db945fb52.1281">AFP</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2011/01/smoking-damages-your-genes-within-minutes-of-lighting-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Are More Americans Smoking?</title>
		<link>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/why-are-more-americans-smoking/</link>
		<comments>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/why-are-more-americans-smoking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>majestic</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smoking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tobacco]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.disinfo.com/?p=14496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c5/Adverse_effects_of_tobacco_smoking.svg/570px-Adverse_effects_of_tobacco_smoking.svg.png" title="Effects of smoking" class="alignright" width="280" />Surprising news from the Centers for Disease Control, reported in <a href="http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/healthday/2009/11/12/progress-in-stamping-out-smoking-has-stalled.html">U.S. News &#38; World Report</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>After decades of progress, the number of Americans who smoke hasn&#8217;t budged over the last five years and actually rose slightly from 2007 to 2008, according to a new report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p>
<p>Over the longer term, smoking rates have declined. From 1998 to 2008, the percentage of smokers in the United States dropped from 24.1 to 20.6 percent.</p>
<p>However, the report notes that &#8220;during the past five years, rates have shown virtually no change,&#8221; and in fact the percentage of Americans who smoke has begun to creep up again, rising from 19.8 percent in 2007 to 20.6 percent in 2008.</p>
<p>Many experts blame the turnaround on recent cutbacks in funding for state tobacco-control programs, which had proven successful.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tobacco is the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S., and we know what&#8230;</p></blockquote>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/c5/Adverse_effects_of_tobacco_smoking.svg/570px-Adverse_effects_of_tobacco_smoking.svg.png" title="Effects of smoking" class="alignright" width="280" />Surprising news from the Centers for Disease Control, reported in <a href="http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/healthday/2009/11/12/progress-in-stamping-out-smoking-has-stalled.html">U.S. News &amp; World Report</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>After decades of progress, the number of Americans who smoke hasn&#8217;t budged over the last five years and actually rose slightly from 2007 to 2008, according to a new report from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.</p>
<p>Over the longer term, smoking rates have declined. From 1998 to 2008, the percentage of smokers in the United States dropped from 24.1 to 20.6 percent.</p>
<p>However, the report notes that &#8220;during the past five years, rates have shown virtually no change,&#8221; and in fact the percentage of Americans who smoke has begun to creep up again, rising from 19.8 percent in 2007 to 20.6 percent in 2008.</p>
<p>Many experts blame the turnaround on recent cutbacks in funding for state tobacco-control programs, which had proven successful.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tobacco is the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S., and we know what to do,&#8221; said Dr. Thomas Frieden, the CDC director. &#8220;We want to provide support to states and localities to implement proven programs, and if we do that, we can save literally millions of lives in the decades to come.&#8221;</p>
<p>The report is published in the Nov. 13 edition of the CDC&#8217;s Morbidity and Morality Weekly Report, and arrives just before the American Cancer Society&#8217;s annual quit-smoking day, the Great American Smokeout, set for Nov. 19&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>[continues in <a href="http://health.usnews.com/articles/health/healthday/2009/11/12/progress-in-stamping-out-smoking-has-stalled.html">U.S. News &amp; World Report</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.disinfo.com/2009/11/why-are-more-americans-smoking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

